0
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

Exposure to Patients With Meningococcal Disease on Aircraft—United States, 1999-2001 FREE

JAMA. 2001;286(2):160-161. doi:10.1001/jama.286.2.160.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

EXPOSURE TO PATIENTS WITH MENINGOCOCCAL DISEASE ON AIRCRAFT—UNITED STATES, 1999-2001

MMWR 2001;50:485-489

1 figure, 1 table omitted

Neisseria meningitidis is a leading cause of bacterial meningitis and sepsis in children and young adults in the United States and is spread through direct contact with respiratory secretions.1 Persons in close contact with patients who have meningococcal disease are at increased risk for contracting the disease.1 Commercial aircraft are suitable environments for the spread of airborne pathogens, including N. meningitidis.2 A case of air-travel–associated meningococcal disease is defined as a patient who meets the case definition of meningococcal disease3 within 14 days of travel on a flight of at least 8 hours duration. Because of concerns about disease transmission aboard aircraft, CDC has developed recommendations to ensure a standard approach to management of airline contacts. This report presents a case of air-travel–associated meningococcal disease and presents guidelines for the management of persons potentially exposed to meningococcus during air travel.

Case Report
Case Report

On May 24, 2001, the New York Department of Health (NYDH) reported a 62-year-old man with meningococcal meningitis to the CDC quarantine station at John F. Kennedy (JFK) International Airport. On May 20, the passenger arrived from Sydney, Australia, after changing planes at Los Angeles International Airport. He began to feel ill during his flight and was assisted from the plane in a wheelchair. No public health officer at JFK airport was contacted to report an ill passenger on board the aircraft.

Case Report

On May 23, the man was hospitalized, and microscopic examination of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed gram-negative diplococci. On May 25, the patient's CSF grew N. meningitidis, serogroup B, and he was diagnosed with meningococcal meningitis.

Case Report

NYDH requested assistance in identifying any airline passengers who required chemoprophylaxis. A New York quarantine inspector contacted the airline station manager to request the flight manifest and passenger contact information. The manifest was not available locally and could be obtained only from the airline's corporate headquarters in Australia. Because contact information from the airline was not complete, quarantine inspectors in New York and Los Angeles manually extracted passenger names and addresses from the customs declaration forms that each international traveler completes on entry to the United States. Within 2 days, they were able to identify the two passengers sitting on either side of the patient. This information was relayed to the two passengers' respective state health departments. One exposed contact could not be located at the address provided on the customs form. The other contact was asymptomatic and the state health department recommended that he take appropriate chemoprophylaxis.

Surveillance Measures
Surveillance Measures

CDC employs a passive surveillance system by which local health departments report suspected cases of air-travel–associated meningococcal disease. From February 1999 through May 2001, CDC received 21 reports, an average of one report every 6 weeks. Approximately half of these cases were reported to a CDC airport quarantine station, and the rest were reported to CDC headquarters. The mean time between the completion of the flight and the onset of illness was 1.9 days (range: 0-10 days). Five case-patients had onset of illness before arrival.

Reported by:
Reported by:

M Layton, MD, New York City Dept of Health. M Cartter, MD, Connecticut State Dept of Public Health. E Bresnitz, MD, State Epidemiologist, New Jersey Dept of Health and Senior Svcs. S Wiersma, MD, Florida Dept of Health. L Mascola, MD, Los Angeles County Dept of Health Svcs. Meningitis and Special Pathogens Br, Div of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases; Surveillance and Epidemiology Br, Div of Global Migration and Quarantine, National Center for Infectious Diseases; and an EIS Officer, CDC.

CDC Editorial Note:
CDC Editorial Note:

Chemoprophylaxis of persons in close contact with an index case–patient is the primary means for prevention of secondary cases of meningococcal disease. Close contacts at high risk for secondary disease include household members, day care center contacts, and anyone directly exposed to a patient's oral secretions (e.g., through kissing and endotracheal tube management).1 The attack rate among household contacts of patients with meningococcal disease is an estimated 500-800 times greater than the general population.4

CDC Editorial Note:

Because the risk for illness is highest during the first few days after infection, chemoprophylaxis should be administered as soon as possible (ideally within 24 hours) after contact with an index case–patient. Chemoprophylaxis administered >14 days is probably of limited or no value. Systemic antibiotics that effectively eliminate nasopharyngeal carriage of N. meningitidis include rifampin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftriaxone.1

CDC Editorial Note:

No cases of secondary disease among air travel contacts of persons with meningococcal disease have been reported; however, passengers who are seated next to a person with meningococcal disease for a prolonged flight may be at higher risk for developing meningococcal disease. Seven investigations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission on airplanes suggest that in-flight transmission of bacterial respiratory pathogens do occur.5 One of these investigations documented transmission of M. tuberculosis from a symptomatic index case-patient to six passengers with no other risk factors who were sitting in the same section of a commercial aircraft during a long flight (>8 hours).6

CDC Editorial Note:

CDC, in collaboration with the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, has developed procedures for the management of air-travel–associated exposure to meningococcus.78 These recommendations are intended to provide uniformity to the procedures followed by the various federal, state, and local health agencies involved in contact investigation and management for meningococcal cases occurring in airline passengers.

CDC Editorial Note:

Health departments from the jurisdiction where the patient resides and where the patient has been visiting should be contacted promptly to facilitate antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis of household members, day care center contacts, and other possible close contacts. Household members traveling with an index case–patient, persons traveling with an index case–patient who have had prolonged close contact (e.g., roommates), and anyone having direct contact with a patient's oral secretions should be identified and the need for antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis evaluated. The assessment of risk to passengers and flight crew members should be based on the flight duration and seating proximity to the index case–patient. For flights of >8 hours, including ground time, passengers who are seated immediately next to an index case–patient are more likely to be exposed directly to the patient's oral secretions and are probably at higher risk than those seated farther from the index case–patient. In the absence of data about increased risk to other passengers, antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis should be considered for those passengers seated in either seat next to an index case–patient.

CDC Editorial Note:

Because passengers disperse over a wide area after arrival, federal health authorities should work with the travel industry to identify passengers requiring chemoprophylaxis. On notification of an air passenger with potential meningococcal disease, the CDC quarantine station with jurisdiction over the port of entry will contact the airline to obtain a passenger manifest, which includes the name and seat assignment for all passengers on the flight. Once quarantine inspectors identify potentially exposed travelers, their names are cross-referenced with the airline's passenger history record that includes a telephone number and frequently an address for the patient. State or local health departments in the patient's area of residence should be responsible for contacting each exposed traveler. If the exposed passenger is a foreign national temporarily visiting the United States, the CDC quarantine station can assist in locating and contacting the person. In addition, the quarantine station will notify the national health authority of the passenger's home country.

CDC Editorial Note:

Most cases of meningococcal disease among air passengers are not detected until after the flight has landed and the passengers have dispersed. CDC and state health departments should enhance surveillance for secondary cases associated with air travel. To facilitate this process, state and local health departments and private physicians should ask all persons with meningococcal disease about recent travel, including flight information.

CDC Editorial Note:

Occasionally, a passenger's illness becomes evident during a flight. During the previous 2 years, five passengers with symptomatic meningococcal disease have flown on international flights to the United States. The airline crew reported only one of these cases before arrival, a critically ill passenger who later died. Federal law requires that an ill passenger on an international conveyance must be reported to the Public Health Service before arrival in the United States.* The pilot should contact the closest of eight CDC quarantine stations that are located at international airports to report an ill passenger. Quarantine station staff will assist the airline in management of the ill passenger and notification of fellow passengers and crew members. Many pilots are not familiar with the requirement to report arriving ill passengers aboard flights. Commercial pilot in-flight manuals should be updated to include procedures for managing an ill passenger and detailed information on how to contact the closest CDC quarantine station.

CDC Editorial Note:

Notification of meningococcal exposures on an aircraft is frequently hindered by difficulty in obtaining passenger contact information. Airlines typically maintain the passenger manifest and history records for 2--7 days, after which they are either archived or destroyed. Some airborne pathogens other than meningococcus have longer incubation periods, including tuberculosis and many bioterrorism agents. As a result, it may be necessary to contact passengers several weeks after a flight has disembarked. To facilitate timely identification and public health notification and management of at-risk passengers, commercial airlines should ensure that electronic passenger manifests and contact information are preserved and readily available for a period of at least 1 month following disembarkation.

References
CDC.  Prevention and control of meningococcal disease: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.2000;49:1-10.
Maloney S, Cetron M. Investigation and management of infectious diseases on international conveyances (airplanes and cruise ships). In: DuPont HL, Steffen R, eds. Textbook of travel medicine and health. 2nd ed. London, England: B.C. Decker Inc., 2001.
CDC.  Case definitions for infectious conditions under public health surveillance.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.1997;46:1-55.
The Meningococcal Disease Surveillance Group.  Analysis of endemic meningococcal disease by serogroup and evaluation of chemoprophylaxis.  J Infect Dis.1976;134:201-4.
World Health Organization.  Tuberculosis and air travel: guideline for prevention and control.  Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1998.
Kenyon TA, Valway SE, Ihle WW, Onorato IM, Castro KG. Transmission of multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis during a long airplane flight.  N Engl J Med.1996;334:933-8.
CDC.  Guidelines for the management of airline passengers exposed to meningococcal disease. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/travel/menin-guidelines.htm. Accessed March 2001.
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.  Guidelines for management of contacts of a patient with meningococcal disease who has recently traveled by airline. Available at http://www.cste.org/ps/2000/2000-id-02.htm. Accessed March 2001.

*42 CFR 71.21(b).

UNIVERSITY OUTBREAK OF CALICIVIRUS INFECTION MISTAKENLY ATTRIBUTED TO SHIGA TOXIN–PRODUCING ESCHERICHIA COLI O157:H7— VIRGINIA, 2000

MMWR. 2001;50:489-491

On February 21-22, 2000, the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) was notified by a university student health center of two suspected cases of Escherichia coli O157:H7. At a local hospital laboratory, stool specimens from the two ill students tested positive for Shiga toxin–producing E. coli (STEC) using a commercially available enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit. Further investigation revealed that the outbreak of gastrointestinal illness was caused by a Norwalk-like virus (NLV), a member of the calicivirus family. This report summarizes the outbreak investigation and laboratory findings used to identify the causative agent, and highlights the need for follow-up cultures on all specimens testing positive for STEC by EIA and for submission of isolates to state laboratories so that public health agencies can respond appropriately in identifying common source outbreaks.

Three staff members from Virginia's epidemiology office were sent to assist the local health department with the epidemiologic and environmental investigations. VDH staff interviewed 12 students who had sought care for gastrointestinal symptoms at the student health center during the previous week. Most students reported illnesses that appeared more likely to be caused by a virus than by STEC (i.e., vomiting and/or diarrhea lasting 1-2 days that occurred approximately 24-48 hours after eating at an area restaurant [restaurant A]). Other restaurant patrons were located by questioning ill students about persons they knew or recognized at restaurant A on February 18. A case of illness was defined as vomiting or diarrhea occurring within 72 hours of eating at restaurant A. A survey was conducted of 36 ill and 32 well restaurant A patrons. The median incubation period was 31.3 hours (range: 2.5-49.0 hours). Symptoms included nausea (97%), vomiting (97%), abdominal cramps (86%), chills (78%), muscle aches (67%), fever (64%), headache (61%), and diarrhea (58%). The median illness duration was 26.5 hours (range: 6-120 hours). One ill person was hospitalized and 10 others sought medical care. Eating a sandwich or "sub" (76%) was associated highly with illness (relative risk = 14.5; 95% confidence interval = 2.1-98.1). No other food item was associated with illness.

The two stool specimens that had tested positive for Shiga toxin at the local hospital laboratory did not yield E. coli O157:H7 or other STEC when tested on February 29 at the Virginia Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services (DCLS) using standard biochemical and EIA analysis. Additional stool specimens obtained from ill persons and submitted to DCLS also did not yield Shiga toxin–producing organisms. On subsequent testing by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, four of eight specimens were positive for NLV. These results were consistent with the patients' clinical presentation.

Reported by:
Reported by:

X Jiang, PhD, N Wilton, E Jing, W Zhong, Center for Pediatric Research, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Hampton Roads, Virginia. D Warren, MD, L Rose, L Nycum, Peninsula Health District; D Jordan, G Gaines, J Beyer, C Puckett, Environmental Health Svcs; ST Kelly, MY Mismas, D Patel, S Henderson, DM Toney, PhD, JL Pearson, DrPH, Div of Consolidated Laboratory Svcs; E Barrett, DMD, MJ Linn, Office of Epidemiology, Virginia Dept of Health. Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Br, Div of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases; Viral Gastroenteritis Section, Respiratory and Enteric Virus Br, Div of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases; and EIS officers, CDC.

CDC Editorial Note:
CDC Editorial Note:

In 1995, rapid assays for Shiga toxin first became commercially available. These nonculture assays can detect E. coli O157:H7 and other Shiga toxin–producing strains in stool specimens and culture broth.1 However, as the findings in this report illustrate, these nonculture rapid assays are subject to false positives, which can result in unnecessary public concern and expenditure of public health resources. Follow-up cultures are needed to confirm the presence of STEC and to obtain isolates for subtyping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis at state public health laboratories.

CDC Editorial Note:

Although subtyping is of limited value to the individual patient, it is a useful tool for identifying and responding to common source outbreaks caused by E. coli O157:H7.2 Several states require clinical laboratories to submit E. coli O157:H7 isolates for this purpose. Routine submission of all STEC to state public health laboratories also allows enhanced surveillance for illness caused by non-O157 STEC. In 2000, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists adopted a position supporting culture confirmation of positive results from rapid assay tests for pathogens of public health importance.3

CDC Editorial Note:

Because the clinical signs and symptoms of NLV infection are nonspecific and overlap with other causes of foodborne disease, criteria were developed to aid health-care providers in identifying NLV-associated infection.4,5 These criteria include (1) an illness of 12-60 hours duration, (2) an incubation period of 12-36 hours, and (3) an illness characterized by acute onset of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and, in some cases, fever and malaise.4,6 Diarrhea is usually more common among adults and vomiting is usually more common among children.4 Additional information on NLV is available from CDC's National Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Branch, Viral Gastroenteritis Section at http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/fact/norwalkv.htm.

References: 6 available

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

CDC.  Prevention and control of meningococcal disease: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.2000;49:1-10.
Maloney S, Cetron M. Investigation and management of infectious diseases on international conveyances (airplanes and cruise ships). In: DuPont HL, Steffen R, eds. Textbook of travel medicine and health. 2nd ed. London, England: B.C. Decker Inc., 2001.
CDC.  Case definitions for infectious conditions under public health surveillance.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.1997;46:1-55.
The Meningococcal Disease Surveillance Group.  Analysis of endemic meningococcal disease by serogroup and evaluation of chemoprophylaxis.  J Infect Dis.1976;134:201-4.
World Health Organization.  Tuberculosis and air travel: guideline for prevention and control.  Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1998.
Kenyon TA, Valway SE, Ihle WW, Onorato IM, Castro KG. Transmission of multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis during a long airplane flight.  N Engl J Med.1996;334:933-8.
CDC.  Guidelines for the management of airline passengers exposed to meningococcal disease. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/travel/menin-guidelines.htm. Accessed March 2001.
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.  Guidelines for management of contacts of a patient with meningococcal disease who has recently traveled by airline. Available at http://www.cste.org/ps/2000/2000-id-02.htm. Accessed March 2001.
CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 during air travel.
Travel Med Infect Dis 2013 Mar-Apr;;11(2):110-8.