In this issue of THE JOURNAL, McGrath and colleagues1
and Magid and colleagues2 examine 2 of the
most contentious issues in the provision of cardiac care: the relationship
between experience and outcome for percutaneous interventions, and the superiority
of percutaneous revascularization (eg, primary angioplasty or other procedures)
relative to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). These
2 issues lead to the question of whether primary angioplasty can be effectively
performed in low-volume hospitals and by low-volume physicians. Supporters
of both primary angioplasty and volume standards will no doubt refer to these
works in their future deliberations.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 11
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Acute Myocardial Infarction
All results at
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.