0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

Surveillance for Possible Estuary-Associated Syndrome—Six States, 1998-1999 FREE

JAMA. 2000;283(23):3062-3063. doi:10.1001/jama.283.23.3062.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

MMWR. 2000;49:372-374

1 table omitted

Pfiesteria piscicida (Pp) is an alga that has been associated with fish kills in estuaries (where fresh water mixes with salty seawater) along the eastern seaboard and possibly with human health effects.1,2 Since June 1, 1998, surveillance for possible estuary-associated syndrome (PEAS), including possible Pp-related human illness, has been conducted in Delaware, Florida, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. This report summarizes passive surveillance for PEAS during June 1, 1998-December 31, 1999, which indicated no persons had illnesses that met PEAS criteria.

The PEAS surveillance system collects information about possible human health problems that may occur after exposure to estuarine water (such as sounds or coastal river mouths or in laboratories or aquaculture facilities). For surveillance purposes, persons are considered to have PEAS if (1) they report developing symptoms within 2 weeks after confirmed exposure to estuarine water; (2) they report memory loss or confusion of any duration and/or three or more selected symptoms (i.e., headache, skin rash at the site of water contact, sensation of burning skin, eye irritation, upper respiratory irritation, muscle cramps, and gastrointestinal symptoms) that, except for skin rash at the site of water contact and sensation of burning skin, persist for greater than or equal to 2 weeks; and (3) a health-care provider cannot identify another cause for the symptoms.

The six state health agencies were available throughout the year to respond to inquiries from the public and health-care providers. Calls from persons requesting information or reporting symptoms that may be related to Pp or Pfiesteria-like organisms (PLOs) were recorded; environmental exposure and symptom information were recorded in the surveillance database. Surveillance information was periodically transferred to CDC for data aggregation and dissemination to the public.

From June 1, 1998, through December 31, 1999, the six state health departments received 1984 calls about Pp, PLOs, and PEAS. Most (96%) calls involved requests for information about Pp, PLOs, or PEAS. Seventy-eight calls concerned a symptomatic person; 54 (69%) of these persons had possible exposure to estuarine water. Of the 54 persons, 44 were seen by or referred to a health-care provider. Of the 44, 24 did not meet PEAS symptom or exposure criteria, 15 had another cause for symptoms identified, and five have environmental and medical results pending. To date, no illnesses have met the PEAS criteria.

REPORTED BY:

AL Hathcock, PhD, C Nace, MS, Delaware Dept of Health and Social Svcs. D Johnson, MD, R Quimbo, MS, Florida Dept of Health. R Venezia, DrPH, A Chapin, MPH, Maryland Dept of Health and Mental Hygiene. JS Cline, DDS, K Buckheit, MPH, P Webb, MPH, North Carolina Dept of Health and Human Svcs. R Ball, MD, N Scruggs, MSPH, South Carolina Dept of Health and Environmental Control. S Jenkins, VMD, LA Peipins, PhD, M Monti, MS, M Brooks, Virginia Dept of Health. Health Studies Br, Div of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC.

CDC EDITORIAL NOTE:

The greatest benefit of the PEAS surveillance system has been to provide information quickly to educate the public. Without specific tests, definitive diagnosis of illnesses associated with Pp or PLOs is not possible. However, health-care providers should continue to report suspected PEAS cases to their local health department. The PEAS criteria may change as new information becomes available from epidemiologic studies and laboratory tests are developed to identify Pp and its putative toxin in water and in human blood.

The lack of PEAS cases may be explained by few "fish events" that have possible links to Pp since June 1, 1998. Fish events include fish kills, large numbers of fish with ulcerative lesions, or fish displaying abnormal behavior. One possible reason for the low number of Pp blooms is the massive hurricane-related flooding during the previous 2 years. Floods can dilute estuaries or deposit contaminants into coastal waters that may affect the life cycle and behavior of Pp.

The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, because surveillance was passive, some cases may have been missed. Second, the number of information-only calls are underreported because several states do not track all information requests because of state differences in hotline system design. Third, data provided may have been incomplete because all states did not use the same data collection methods; however, a standardized core data collection method has been developed. Finally, the surveillance system tracks PEAS rather than Pp-related illness because a Pp toxin(s) has not been identified; therefore, a biomarker of exposure has not been developed. For this reason, association between PEAS and Pp remains to be established. Detection of Pp or lesioned fish in water has been used as evidence of suspected Pp toxin(s).3 However, Pp has been found in waters without reports of harm to fish or persons, and fish lesions can result from a variety of biologic, physical, and environmental factors that may be unrelated to Pp. Consequently, detecting Pp or observing lesioned fish may not indicate the presence of a putative Pp toxin(s).

It is unclear whether persons exposed to Pp while swimming, boating, or engaging in other recreational activities in coastal waters are at risk for developing PEAS. PEAS is not infectious and has not been associated with eating fish or shellfish caught in waters where Pp has been found. However, persons should avoid areas with large numbers of diseased, dying, or dead fish and should promptly report those areas to the state's environmental or natural resource agency. In addition, persons should not go in or near the water in areas that are closed officially by the state and should not harvest or eat fish or shellfish from these areas.

Persons who experience health problems after exposure to estuarine water, a fish-disease event, or a fish-kill site should contact their health-care provider and state or local public health agency. Several states have established toll-free PEAS information lines: Delaware, (800) 523-3336; Florida, (888) 232-8635; Maryland, (888) 584-3110; North Carolina, (888) 823-6915; South Carolina, (888) 481-0125; and Virginia, (888) 238-6154.

REFERENCES

Fleming  LEEasom  JBaden  D  et al.  Emerging harmful algal blooms and human health: Pfiesteria and related organisms. Toxicol Pathol. 1999;27573- 81
Link to Article
Grattan  LMOldach  DTracy  JK  et al.  Learning and memory difficulties after environmental exposure to waterways containing toxin-producing Pfiesteria or Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates. Lancet. 1998;352532- 9
Link to Article
CDC, Results of the Public Health Response to Pfiesteria Workshop—Atlanta, Georgia, September 29-30, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46951- 2

Figures

Tables

References

Fleming  LEEasom  JBaden  D  et al.  Emerging harmful algal blooms and human health: Pfiesteria and related organisms. Toxicol Pathol. 1999;27573- 81
Link to Article
Grattan  LMOldach  DTracy  JK  et al.  Learning and memory difficulties after environmental exposure to waterways containing toxin-producing Pfiesteria or Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates. Lancet. 1998;352532- 9
Link to Article
CDC, Results of the Public Health Response to Pfiesteria Workshop—Atlanta, Georgia, September 29-30, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46951- 2
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 4

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles