Editorial |

Thanking Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Readers—Constancy in a Time of Change

Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD; Richard M. Glass, MD; Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2000;283(15):2016-2017. doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2016.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The years 1999-2000 could serve quite well as a period of marked changes in biomedical publications. Several important developments involving scientific publications during this time represent significant changes that may be recognized as turning points for years to come. Perhaps most noteworthy is the tremendous capabilities of electronic information dissemination, with the ever-increasing power, speed, reach, and convenience of the Internet. This development has revolutionized and probably changed forever the dissemination of scientific information both from centralized repositories and institutions1 and from individual journals.2 In addition, concerns about ensuring proper attribution and credit for authorship of scientific articles have led to efforts to define the exact contributions of each author of a published article more precisely and to changes in ways to report these contributions more completely.3,4 Moreover, the dismissal of the editors-in-chief of 2 major general medical journals in 1999 resulted in careful reexamination of and substantial changes in the relationship between editors and owners of scientific journals.5,6 Yet, regardless of the magnitude or potential far-reaching implications of these changes and other challenges involving scientific publications, the importance of and appreciation for 3 key constituencies—authors, peer reviewers, and readers—undoubtedly have and must remain unchanged.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 2

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles