We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

The Quest to Quantify Quality

Stephan D. Fihn, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2000;283(13):1740-1742. doi:10.1001/jama.283.13.1740.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In this era of rapidly changing medical practice, it may appear to some that efforts to improve the quality of medical care are a relatively new development. In fact, current methods to enhance quality, like all of medical practice, have evolved. Although the modern conceptual framework of quality measurement, based on structure, process, and outcome, was introduced by Donabedian1 more than 30 years ago, the struggle to improve medical care has been protracted. Scholars as ancient as Hippocrates recognized the critical necessity for not only a knowledgeable physician but also for a coordinated delivery system and a scientific basis for practice. 2 Likewise, in Osler's Modern Medicine (1907),3 in which the absence of an effective treatment for lobar pneumonia is readily acknowledged, the authors plead for controlled studies with adequate sample sizes and detailed information on covariates: "age, sex, social circumstances and habits; the environment, character of the epidemic, season of the year . . . and many other details must be constant features in the groups of cases arranged for comparison." Around the same time, Codman4 proposed that hospitals track every patient for a time sufficient to ascertain whether treatment was effective, foreshadowing today's outcomes management programs.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

17 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles