0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Special Communication |

Graduate Medical Education, 1998-1999:  A Closer Look

Rebecca S. Miller, MS; Marvin R. Dunn, MD; Thomas Richter, MA
JAMA. 1999;282(9):855-860. doi:10.1001/jama.282.9.855.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Despite the ever-present risk of a critical imbalance in the physician workforce total numbers and specialty distribution, no systematic planning mechanism is in place. Furthermore, the length of training for graduate medical education (GME) precludes timely rectification of imbalances. We report GME activities collected in the American Medical Association Annual Survey of Graduate Medical Education Programs for 1998-1999, along with trends during the last 3 to 6 years. These data initially suggest that little has changed during the past several years; however, on closer examination, small but significant changes during the past 2 years may have serious consequences if continued. The total number of resident physicians, which has been constant during the last several years, decreased in 1998 by 760 from the previous year, while the number of programs continues to increase (6.1% since 1993). The number of US medical graduates entering GME programs remained stable during the last 6 years, the number of osteopathic graduates entering GME increased by 55.7%, and the number of international medical graduates (IMGs) entering GME continued to drop (down 13.2% since 1993). More IMGs tend to pursue additional training than do US graduates (in 1997, 32.9% vs 23.6%). Because IMGs are remaining in GME programs for longer periods, the total number of IMGs has not yet reflected significant change. About 62% of IMGs now entering GME training are either US citizens or permanent residents; ethnic minority residents are not decreasing in numbers as some predicted; and for the first time in the past 5 years, the primary care specialties have ceased their persistent growth. Toward the end of GME, the number of residents leaving programs before completion increased by 5.7% during the last 3 years. While some of these changes may be ascribed to reduced GME funding through the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, other factors clearly are at play. To anticipate future changes in the physician workforce, these factors should be identified to permit them to be monitored and modified as needed.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Figure 1. Total Number of Resident Physicians in ACGME-Accredited and Combined Specialty GME Programs and Resident Physicians in GY1 Positions, 1993-1998
Graphic Jump Location
ACGME indicates Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; GME, graduate medical education; and GY1, graduate year 1.
Figure 2. Total Number of Residents, USMG Residents, and IMG Residents Training in Primary Care Specialties and in Primary Care Combined Specialties, 1993-1998
Graphic Jump Location
USMG indicates US medical school graduate; IMG, international medical graduate. Figure shows residents training in the primary care specialties of family practice, internal medicine (including approximately 1500 preliminary positions in internal medicine each year), and pediatrics and in the combined specialties of internal medicine/pediatrics and internal medicine/family practice.

Tables

References

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 30

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();