0
Editorial |

Decisions Regarding Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns

Norman Fost, MD, MPH
JAMA. 1999;281(21):2041-2043. doi:10.1001/jama.281.21.2041.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

There has been a remarkable transformation during the past 15 years in the process and substance of decisions regarding medical treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns. For thousands of years, parents exercised virtual ownership over their infants.1 Infanticide was common in Western Europe until late in the 19th Century.23 In the United States during the 1970s, standard medical treatment for curable disorders was commonly withheld from infants with Down syndrome, a practice that was supported by two thirds of pediatricians.45 In 1983, a major medical center reported that standard treatment was withheld from more than half of a cohort of infants referred with spina bifida.6 These decisions were often driven by directive counseling by the infants' physician, with or without the consent of the parents. Courts were generally supportive of the rights of biologic parents to make such decisions, even when it was implausible that withholding treatment was in the child's interests.7

Topics

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 18

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Topics
Jobs