We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Medical News & Perspectives |

Agencies Use Social Media to Track Foodborne Illness

Bridget M. Kuehn, MSJ
JAMA. 2014;312(2):117-118. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.7731.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Most cases of foodborne illness are never reported to public health authorities. But that doesn’t mean those afflicted suffer in silence. Many people turn to social media to complain and even identify food purveyors they believe are responsible.

To tap into this rich source of information, city public health departments have begun mining the tweets and online reviews of those possibly sickened by food.

The City of Chicago Department of Public Health was the first to test the potential of social media in identifying foodborne outbreaks. The department partnered with civic-minded local technologists and the Smart Chicago Collaborative, a nonprofit organization that uses technology to improve the lives of Chicagoans, to develop an application to monitor Twitter for possible food poisoning references. A similar project is under way in New York, where the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene is working with Columbia University technologists and the review website Yelp to comb restaurant patrons’ comments for signs of a budding outbreak.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview


Place holder to copy figure label and caption

Graphic Jump LocationImage not available.

Public health departments in Chicago and New York are using social media tools such as Twitter and Yelp as sources of consumer comments that might help identify outbreaks of foodborne illness.




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

4 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Monitoring food safety violation reports from internet forums. Stud Health Technol Inform 2014;205():1090-4.

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Case 3

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Case 3