We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Resident Forum |

PATH Audit Effects on Medical Education FREE

Robert Phillips, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Edited by Charlene Breedlove, Associate Editor.

JAMA. 1998;280(9):766E. doi:10.1001/jama.280.9.766.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

The words PATH audit can strike terror in the hearts of hospital and clinic administrators, a reaction that I shared during my family practice internship in 1995. Although Medicare patients constituted only 17% of the clinic's billings, the institution chose to apply a stringent interpretation of the Health Care Financing Administration's (HCFA) requirements to all patients out of fear of a PATH (Payment for Academic Teaching Hospitals) audit. Because HCFA's contracted carriers interpreted HCFA's physician supervision rules differently than HCFA itself, academic medical centers have been investigated and, in some cases, fined for not complying with HCFA's interpretation. The broad application of these rules has had both positive and negative effects on residents' clinical training, without either quality of training or patient care being the focus of this change.

On the positive side, during the first 6 months of my internship and before the new rules were implemented, I reviewed every clinic patient with an attending physician, who would then see every patient about whom either of us felt "uncomfortable." At the end of the 6-month trial, the physician remained present to discuss patient care, as required by the physician supervision rules in place at the time, but we had more responsibility and discretion in discussing patients than would exist today. Having no notes to write on patient charts, the attendings could focus on teaching and on reviewing the charts. Medical students had autonomy to generate patient care notes under the close supervision of residents and faculty members, which gave them a sense of responsibility for their work, for the patient, and for self-directed learning.

Three years and $42 million in PATH audit settlements later, family practice interns now must have their own attending. The strict interpretation of HCFA's physician supervision rules requires that this "physical presence" attending see each patient and write a comprehensive note, an additional "exception" attending attends only for residents in their second year or above. Because attendings must spend their time writing notes, they have limited time available to teach and to discuss patient care. They must repeat a large portion of the physical examination for patient billings above a specified amount and must be present for all procedures no matter how small. Medical students, having no way either to write or dictate clinic notes, are restricted to observer status.

To learn the experiences of others in my program, I informally surveyed those who had trained under both interpretations of the oversight rules. Of the 23 residents surveyed, 16 indicated that their ability to discuss patients with an attending was the same or better under the current rule interpretation; however, they felt their procedural training had suffered, as they often had to forgo performing clinic procedures because attendings did not have time to be there. Four residents said that changes in the clinic environment had influenced their decisions not to pursue careers in academic medicine. Because complying with the latest HCFA interpretation requires more time, fewer patients are scheduled with residents, especially in the specialty clinics. Anecdotally, residents complain of having less time to spend with patients and spending more time completing documentation; attendings admit feeling frustrated at having to spend their interactive time with each resident writing patient-care notes rather than focusing on teaching.

While the effects of HCFA's new rulings and PATH audits are not entirely negative, concern with improving residents' training and patient care are not driving the changes in education. The American Medical Association had been very vocal in defending academic teaching institutions, but only 1 resolution, submitted by the AMA-Resident Physicians Section, has addressed the subtle encroachments made by the latest interpretation of the HCFA supervision rules on education in the clinical setting. The recent dismissal of a lawsuit filed by the AMA, the Association of American Medical Colleges, and 45 other groups against the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General may give the AMA pause. In that pause, the AMA has an opportunity to examine the other effects of PATH-audit fear and defend against the further erosion of our profession's control of its own educational standards.




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Matching Content and Context: Evidence-Based Teaching Scripts

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Verbal Synopses