0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Controversies |

The Case for Conservative Management of Early HIV Disease

William J. Burman, MD; Randall R. Reves, MD; David L. Cohn, MD
JAMA. 1998;280(1):93-95. doi:10.1001/jama.280.1.93.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

THE LAST 3 years have been a remarkable time to be involved in the care of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Improvements in antiretroviral therapy have decreased the rates of death and opportunistic infections by about 70% in our clinic (W.J.B., R.R.R., and D.L.C., unpublished data, 1998) and brought an atmosphere of hope to patients and clinicians. However, we read with concern the 1997 recommendations from the International AIDS Society–USA Panel regarding the use of therapy for all patients with an HIV RNA level greater than 5000 to 10000 copies/mL, regardless of CD4 cell count.1 Aggressive treatment of early HIV infection was also recommended by a panel convened by the Department of Health and Human Services.2 The Department of Health and Human Services panel was more conservative and presented the potential advantages and disadvantages of aggressive, early therapy, but eventually recommended treatment of any patient with a CD4 cell count less than 0.50×109/L (<500/µL) or a viral load greater than 10000 to 20000 copies/mL.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Figures

Tables

References

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

25 Views
23 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Quick Reference

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Quick Reference

×
brightcove.createExperiences();