We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Resident Forum |

ACGME Reviews Its Institutional Requirements FREE

Howard Pomeranz, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Edited by Ashish Bajaj, Department of Resident Physician Services, American Medical Association.

JAMA. 1998;279(23):1870Q. doi:10.1001/jama.279.23.1870.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

A recent petition by resident physicians to the National Labor Relations Board1 has raised the question, how well are resident physicians represented in their residency programs? In response, the American Medical Association (AMA) asked the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to address this issue. Last week's Resident Forum column discussed the ACGME's recent adoption of a "rapid response mechanism" to deal with alleged egregious accreditation violations by residency programs. The ACGME has also been reviewing its institutional requirements, which contains the standards that each institution must meet in order to sponsor graduate medical education (GME) programs.

The ACGME delegated consideration of this issue to its Institutional Review Committee (IRC), which is charged with the review of institutions sponsoring GME programs. The institutional requirements covers matters such as institutional commitment to provide organizational and financial support for GME; the composition and responsibilities of the institution's GME Committee, which oversees all aspects of GME, including creation and review of all GME policies and procedures and internal review of residency programs; quality assurance activities; resident participation in education activities; resident financial support, benefits and conditions of employment; and resident supervision, duty hours, and work environment.

After considerable deliberation, the IRC proposed the following revisions to the institutional requirements:

  • The GME Committee must include a resident physician as a voting member.

  • The GME Committee must ensure that an institution's educational environment allows questions to be raised and resolved without fear of intimidation or retaliation. This includes providing a formal communication system through which residents can confidentially voice their concerns. This may be accomplished through a resident or house staff organization or through other forums.

  • Institutions must enact fair policies and procedures regarding the adjudication of resident grievances and regarding disciplinary actions against residents that could result in dismissal or could significantly threaten the resident's career development.

  • Each year, residents must be given the opportunity to submit to program directors or other designated officials a confidential written evaluation of faculty members and of their educational experience.

  • Residency programs must not require residents to sign a noncompetition guarantee. For example, a program cannot limit the resident's ability to practice within certain geographic boundaries after completing the residency program.

  • The institution's contract with the resident must contain or reference provisions for financial support, vacation policies, professional liability insurance, disability insurance, leave benefits, and counseling services. It must also include policies regarding residents' responsibilities, professional activities outside the education program (moonlighting), and grievance procedures.

These proposed revisions will be voted on at the ACGME's June meeting and, if approved, will become effective July 1, 1998. We anticipate that the revised requirements will encourage greater dialogue and resident involvement with officials and faculty at their training institutions regarding patient care and resident well-being. The AMA will continue to report on these matters as they develop.

 Collective negotiations for residents.  JAMA.1998;279:498j.




 Collective negotiations for residents.  JAMA.1998;279:498j.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles