Policy Perspectives |

Rolling Down the Runway:  The Challenges Ahead for Quality Report Cards

Arnold M. Epstein, MD, MA
JAMA. 1998;279(21):1691-1696. doi:10.1001/jama.279.21.1691.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Today, steadily increasing numbers of hospitals and health plans are publicly releasing performance reports on the quality of care to permit comparisons across different providers. Our experience in recent years has provided important new evidence of what public quality reporting can accomplish and the difficulties it faces. Several years ago, the most important impediments to quality reporting may have been the availability of acceptable quality indicators and the feasibility of voluntary, standardized data collection by health plans. We have made strides in these areas. The Health Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) has expanded, and there have been new innovations in collecting data on quality from both patients and physicians. Hundreds of health plans have begun to report standardized quality data on a routine basis either voluntarily or in response to requirements from the Health Care Financing Administration, state Medicaid agencies, or private payers. Now, the more formidable barriers to the use of quality report cards may relate to the ways we report the data and use it. We need to find acceptable middle ground for those who believe information on individual physicians is critical and those who believe it is harmful. We need to reap the advantages in different modalities of data collection and different tools for quality management. Most of all, we need to find better ways to use quality reporting to empower purchasers and consumers and improve quality of care.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours




Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 122

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Chapter e23. How to Use an Article About Quality Improvement