0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Resident Forum |

ACGME Launches Outcomes Assessment Project FREE

Susan Swing, PhD
[+] Author Affiliations

Edited by Gloria Robertson, Department of Resident Physician Services, American Medical Association.


JAMA. 1998;279(18):1492. doi:10.1001/jama.279.18.1492.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recently launched a 3-year project to study ways to better incorporate educational outcomes assessment into the residency review process. The long-term goal of the project is to develop accreditation procedures that take into account not only whether residency programs provide residents with adequate opportunities to learn but also whether a program's residents actually develop into competent patient care providers and professionals. The ACGME believes that this project will lead to better ways to measure the quality of graduate medical education.

The ACGME is responsible for evaluating the quality of the 7619 residency programs in the United States and Puerto Rico. The ACGME delegates accrediting authority to 27 Residency Review Committees. The Residency Review Committees conduct the evaluations within their specialty and/or subspecialties. Traditionally, accreditation reviews have focused on process and structure variables, such as availability of facilities and equipment, number of faculty, conferences held, and rotations offered. This project will look into changing the reviews to put more emphasis on outcomes.

For outcomes assessment to be truly useful, we must first determine precisely what should be learned and measured as educational outcomes. The changes in our nation's health system have created the need to examine whether what residents are learning during residency is sufficient to provide care in an environment where some stakeholders advocate evidence-based, cost-effective, patient-centered care as a new standard. As part of its project, the ACGME will consider the emerging needs of our health system and will identify the general competencies that should be better developed during residency training to address those needs. The ACGME will also continue to ensure that residents receive specialty-specific knowledge and skills. Among the general competencies we are examining are knowledge, skills, and attitudes pertaining to medical informatics, professionalism, evidence-based decision making, medical ethics, interpersonal communication, teamwork, continuous quality improvement, and practice management in diverse health systems and settings.

Outcomes assessment will be most valuable if the results provide evidence that residents have attained essential patient care and related professional competencies and if the results offer feedback that will help improve the performance of individual residents and residency programs. Currently, the only outcome measure used by most Residency Review Committees to judge the quality of a residency program is residents' aggregate performance on certification board examinations, and the most commonly used method of assessing clinical skills during training is global ratings on categories of clinical performance, both of which fall short in one or more ways. For example, board examinations test clinical knowledge and cognitive skills but not clinical performance. Global ratings assess clinical performance but provide no specific feedback to improve performance.

The ACGME project will attempt to identify other assessment methods to supplement those currently used. Among the methods to be examined are ratings tied to specific patient encounters, ratings of patient satisfaction, objective-structured clinical examinations, graduates' perceptions of the adequacy of their education, and possibly, practice patterns.

As the ACGME proceeds with its study, we will be seeking input from different groups. We want to gather resident physicians' perceptions regarding competencies they will need in the future, the effectiveness of current educational practices for inculcating competencies, the effectiveness of assessment tools for evaluating learning and providing useful feedback, and how best to use outcomes data to improve the quality of residency education. We will gather residents' input on these issues through short surveys and discussion forums conducted with selected participants in residency programs and professional meetings.

We look forward to obtaining your viewpoints.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 11

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Was Outcome Assessed Uniformly in the Experimental and Control Groups?

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature EDUCATION GUIDES
Appraising Patient Management Recommendations: Practice Guidelines