Context.— Growth of at-risk managed care contracts between health plans and medical
groups has been well documented, but less is known about the nature of financial
incentives within those medical groups or their effects on health care utilization.
Objective.— To test whether utilization and cost of health services per enrollee
were influenced independently by the compensation method of the enrollee's
primary care physician.
Design.— Survey of medical groups contracting with selected managed care health
plans, linked to 1994 plan enrollment and utilization data for adult enrollees.
Setting.— Medical groups, major managed care health plans, and their patients/enrollees
in the state of Washington.
Study Participants.— Sixty medical groups in Washington, 865 primary care physicians (internal
medicine, pediatrics, family practice, or general practice) from those groups
and affiliated with 1 or more of 4 managed care health plans, and 200931 adult
Intervention.— The effect of method of primary care physician's compensation on the
utilization and cost of health services was analyzed by weighted least squares
and random effects regression.
Main Outcome Measures.— Total visits, hospital days, and per member per year estimated costs.
Results.— Compensation method was not significantly (P>.30)
related to utilization and cost in any multivariate analyses. Patient age
(P<.001), female gender (P<.001),
and plan benefit level (P<.001) were significantly
positively related to visits, hospital days, and per member per year costs.
The primary care physician's age was significantly negatively related (P<.001) to all 3 dependent measures.
Conclusions.— Compensation method was not significantly related to use and cost of
health services per person. Enrollee, physician, and health plan benefit factors
were the prime determinants of utilization and cost of health services.