We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Using Restriction to Minimize Bias in Observational Studies—Reply

Bruce M. Psaty, MD, PhD; David S. Siscovick, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2010;304(21):2359-2360. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1728.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply: The purpose of our Commentary was to illustrate the use of restriction to minimize bias in observational studies. Drs Turakhia and Heidenreich chose to illustrate how the use of restriction might introduce bias. Their example focuses on a cohort study of low-risk patients with atrial fibrillation treated either with warfarin or aspirin.

Why laboratory testing would be used as the method of restriction remains unclear in their example. Presumably, they want to exclude or censor patients who discontinue the use of warfarin. If so, then the optimal method of assuring exposure status is not laboratory testing; it would be some combination of warfarin prescription refills available from a computerized pharmacy database plus medical record reviews or patient interviews that capture information about changes in exposure that may have occurred between refills. The details provided by Turakhia and Heidenreich fail to address how they would assess the use of aspirin, an over-the-counter drug, for which high-quality information may not be available in any form in the medical record or the pharmacy data.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




December 1, 2010
Mintu P. Turakhia, MD, MAS; Paul A. Heidenreich, MD, MS
JAMA. 2010;304(21):2359-2360. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1727.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.