Letters |

Trends in US Emergency Department Visits—Reply

Ning Tang, MD; Renee Y. Hsia, MD, MSc; Ralph Gonzales, MD, MSPH
JAMA. 2010;304(18):2014-2015. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1581.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply: Dr Epelde contrasts the Spanish and US health care systems and notes that, despite providing universal and free health care, Spain also struggles with increasing ED visits. Universal and free health care does not necessarily translate into easy access to primary care. Thus, issues related to access to primary care and the aging population will need to be explored in Spain as well.

We agree that the more consumerist culture both in the United States and globally, in which “one-stop shopping” is becoming the norm, may contribute to the increase in ED utilization. Indeed, other US studies have shown that patients who have a private physician actually have a higher likelihood of visiting the ED compared with those without a usual source of care.1 Our study provides new insights to the phenomenon of increased ED utilization in the United States by showing that visits for ambulatory care–sensitive conditions have increased, particularly in adults with Medicaid. We concur that the task of providing appropriate care for all patients in the appropriate setting will require a multipronged approach both in the ED and ambulatory care settings, and ultimately the integration of the entire medical care system.


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




November 10, 2010
Margaret Kirkegaard, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2010;304(18):2014-2015. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1580.
November 10, 2010
Francisco Epelde, MD
JAMA. 2010;304(18):2014-2015. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1579.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.