0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letters |

Graduating US Medical Students Who Do Not Obtain a PGY-1 Training Position FREE

Henry M. Sondheimer, MD
JAMA. 2010;304(11):1168-1169. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1316.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

To the Editor: The number of graduating US medical students is increasing more rapidly than the number of postgraduate training positions.1 The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) has experienced a decrease in the number of unfilled positions for first postgraduate year (PGY-1) training while the number of unmatched seniors in US allopathic medical schools (US MDs) has remained stable.2 After the 2010 NRMP, there were for the first time more unmatched US MD seniors (1078) than available PGY-1 positions (1060).2 Applicants who fail to match either through the NRMP or the programs occurring earlier each winter (the Department of Defense Match and the San Francisco Match) scramble for the remaining PGY-1 positions after the NRMP match. Because this process is unmonitored, it has been unclear how many qualified US MD students fail to acquire a PGY-1 position through the matching programs and the subsequent scramble. This study was undertaken to determine this number for 2010 US MD graduates.

Two weeks after the 2010 NRMP match (which occurred on March 15, 2010), an email survey was conducted among student affairs deans of the 126 US MD medical schools with a 2010 graduating class. Each dean was asked to report the number of seniors participating in the NRMP; number of seniors unmatched after the NRMP; number of seniors without a PGY-1 position 2 weeks after the NRMP; number of fully qualified seniors without a PGY-1 position for July 1, 2010; the dean's opinion of the primary reasons each senior failed to acquire a PGY-1 position; and number of graduates from previous classes participating in and matching during the 2010 NRMP. Ten possible reasons for failing to match were listed, with an open line for “other” also provided (Table). The survey closed on April 20, 2010. Of the 126 deans, 111 (88%) responded; there were no geographic or public/private differences among the nonrespondents. The study was determined to be an exempt form of human subjects research by the Association of American Medical Colleges institutional review board.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable. Results of the 2010 National Residency Matching Program Match as Reported by 111 of 126 Student Affairs Deans of US Allopathic Medical Schools (N = 14623 Students)

The deans reported that 871 of 14 623 participating seniors (6.0%; range, 0-26 students per school) were unmatched after the NRMP (Table). This is similar to the 6.7% for US seniors failing to match reported by the NRMP.2 Of these 871 seniors, 194 remained without a PGY-1 position after the scramble, but only 179 (1.2% of 14 623; range, 0-12 students per school) were believed by their deans to be fully qualified to start PGY-1 training; 15 were judged not qualified. The leading reasons reported for qualified students' failure to obtain a PGY-1 position were “not competitive for first choice specialty” and “USMLE score issues.”

US MD seniors filled 65.7% of available PGY-1 positions in the 2010 NRMP match, but 95.4% of the positions were filled, the difference consisting primarily of graduates of osteopathic medical schools, US citizen graduates of international medical schools, and non–US citizen graduates of international medical schools.2 The percentage of US MD seniors failing to match through the NRMP has remained stable at 6% to 7% during the past 5 years.2 However, the number of unfilled PGY-1 positions after the match has decreased from 1587 in 2006 to 1060 in 2010.2

Study limitations include an inability to confirm the accuracy of the deans' reports and opinions. Nevertheless, this survey indicates that a significant number of seniors may fail to realistically assess their competitiveness for postgraduate positions in the most highly sought fields or fail to rank programs in less competitive specialties. With the number of positions after the NRMP match decreasing, efforts must be made to appropriately counsel senior medical students on their training options.

Author Contributions: Dr Sondheimer had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Financial Disclosure: Dr Sondheimer reported receiving compensation as a full-time employee of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Additional Contributions: Lauren Jolliff, BA, provided technical assistance; she received compensation as a full-time employee of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Salsberg E, Rockey PH, Rivers KL, Brotherton SE, Jackson GR. US residency training before and after the 1997 Balanced Budget Act.  JAMA. 2008;300(10):1174-1180
PubMed   |  Link to Article
 National Resident Matching Program advance data tables: 2010 main residency match. National Resident Matching Program Web site. http://www.nrmp.org/data/advancedatatables2010.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2010

Figures

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable. Results of the 2010 National Residency Matching Program Match as Reported by 111 of 126 Student Affairs Deans of US Allopathic Medical Schools (N = 14623 Students)

References

Salsberg E, Rockey PH, Rivers KL, Brotherton SE, Jackson GR. US residency training before and after the 1997 Balanced Budget Act.  JAMA. 2008;300(10):1174-1180
PubMed   |  Link to Article
 National Resident Matching Program advance data tables: 2010 main residency match. National Resident Matching Program Web site. http://www.nrmp.org/data/advancedatatables2010.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2010
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 4

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles