We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Advancing the Care of Cardiac Patients Using Registry Data Going Where Randomized Clinical Trials Dare Not

Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2010;303(21):2188-2189. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.743.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Cardiovascular medicine has seen numerous advances, fueled by data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). A particularly important example has been in the care of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Data supporting either prompt mechanical or pharmacologic reperfusion are now abundant. A limitation to the potential application of this new knowledge, however, has been lack of optimal implementation of these reperfusion strategies in real-world patients. This inability to translate RCT data into practice is attributable to several factors. Physicians may be unaware of trial results, especially soon after new findings are published or incorporated into clinical guidelines, although this is an unlikely explanation with respect to care for acute MI in the current era. Physicians may be skeptical about the relevance of RCT findings to their patient population. This may be particularly true in groups such as older patients, who remain underrepresented in RCTs, or in patients with multiple comorbid conditions, who typically are excluded from RCTs. Furthermore, not every clinical question is amenable to RCT design. Because of these limitations to extrapolation of RCT results to actual practice, large regional databases and registries are vital to round out the knowledge basis for clinical decision making.



Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

17 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles