We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Book and Media Reviews |

Incurable and Intolerable: Chronic Disease and Slow Death in Nineteenth-Century France

Dorothy Porter, PhD, Reviewer
JAMA. 2010;303(1):79-80. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1950.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In this insightful and erudite volume, Jason Szabo takes up the social, cultural, and medical history of terminal chronic illness in 19th-century France and charts the misery often hidden by a more extensive focus on the effects of epidemic infections. Szabo begins by unraveling the complex conceptual and practical conundrum posed to medicine and its scientific allies by incurable illness throughout the 19th century. The visceral debates between the vitalist-physiologist and inflammation theorist, Francois-Joseph-Victor Broussais, and the anatomist-pathologist and inventor of the stethoscope, René Laennec, and their disciples is well documented. Szabo concentrates, however, on their intellectual duel, expressed through mudslinging over tuberculosis and cancer. Here, Szabo draws out the effects of the contingent definition of incurability on the contentious issues of diathesis, disease, and therapeutic nihilism, which stalked the French medical profession throughout the period. Szabo then logs the convoluted exit from the deterministic constitutionalist theory of chronic diatheses to the reinvention of hope that opportunities still existed for successful therapeutic intervention. This was a difficult professional balance to strike, because medicine had no specifically targeted cures for the individualized diatheses asserted. Physicians, therefore, relied on constitutional inevitability to explain the death of patients that they were unable to prevent.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.