0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Improving Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients:  The Seduction of Physiology

Arthur S. Slutsky, MD
JAMA. 2009;302(18):2030-2032. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1653.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the most severe form of acute lung injury, is a deadly condition characterized by infiltrates on chest radiography and severe hypoxemia not secondary to left heart failure. The syndrome affects approximately 200 000 adults in the United States annually and has a mortality of 35% to 45%.1 Ironically, mechanical ventilation—a therapy that is initially lifesaving—has contributed to the subsequent high mortality. In clinicians' previous zeal to maintain relatively normal blood gas values, they ventilated patients using relatively large tidal volumes. This approach changed with greater insight into the pathophysiology of ARDS, better understanding of the importance of ventilator-induced lung injury,2 and a large-scale clinical trial demonstrating that a ventilatory strategy using smaller tidal volumes decreased mortality from 40% to 31%.3 However, mortality in patients with ARDS remains high, and in some patients the current lung-protective strategy is not lung-protective enough. This has led to ongoing research into better methods of applying mechanical ventilation.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 5

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();