0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

National, State, and Urban Area Vaccination Coverage Levels Among Children Aged 19-35 Months—United States, 2000 FREE

JAMA. 2001;286(10):1169-1170. doi:10.1001/jama.286.10.1169-JWR0912-2-1.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

MMWR. 2001;50:637-641

2 tables omitted

Since the early 1970s, childhood vaccination has prevented millions of illnesses and tens of thousands of deaths.1 For these health benefits to continue, high levels of vaccination coverage must be attained for each new birth cohort and must be monitored to ensure protection from disease, to characterize undervaccinated populations, and to evaluate efforts to increase coverage. The National Immunization Survey (NIS) provides ongoing national estimates of vaccination coverage among preschool-aged children for the 50 states and 28 selected urban areas.*2,3 For this report, NIS data collected during 2000 were compared with 1999 data; findings indicate that, during 2000,† significant increases were reported on the national level of vaccination coverage with varicella and hepatitis B, and small but statistically significant decreases were reported in coverage with diphtheria, and tetanus toxoid, and pertussis vaccine. Coverage with poliovirus vaccine, Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine, and measles-mumps-rubella vaccine was not significantly different from 1999. As in previous years,4 coverage varied among states. To maximize coverage among preschool-aged children, vaccination providers should continue to apply such strategies as reminders and recalls.

To collect vaccination data for children aged 19-35 months, NIS uses a random-digit-dialing sample of telephone numbers for each survey area. During 2000, 34,087 household interviews were completed. Contacted providers submitted data for 22,958 children; the data then were weighted to represent all children surveyed and to account for nonresponding households, lower vaccination coverage among children in households without telephones, and changes in natality patterns.

During 2000, national vaccination coverage with three doses of any diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DTaP3) declined from 95.9% in 1999 to 94.1%; coverage with four doses of any diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DTaP4) declined from 83.3% in 1999 to 81.7%. Coverage was not significantly different from 1999 to 2000 for three doses of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV3) (from 89.6% to 89.5%), three doses of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib3) (from 93.5% to 93.4%), and one dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (1MMR) (from 91.5% to 90.5%). During 2000, coverage with one dose of varicella vaccine increased from 57.5% in 1999 to 67.8%, and coverage with three doses of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB3) increased from 88.1% in 1999 to 90.3%. National coverage with combined vaccination series 4:3:1:3 (DTaP4, OPV3, one dose of measles-containing vaccine, and Hib3) and 4:3:1:3:3 (4:3:1:3 series and HepB3) decreased from 1999 to 2000 (78.4% to 76.2% and 73.2% to 72.8%, respectively). State-specific and urban-area coverage varied.‡

REPORTED BY:

Data Management Div, National Immunization Program, CDC.

CDC EDITORIAL NOTE:

National coverage with routinely recommended childhood vaccines increased substantially after the Childhood Immunization Initiative was implemented in 1993.5 Although coverage with recommended vaccines for each new birth cohort remains high, vigilance is needed to maintain these levels. The slight declines in coverage with certain vaccines from 1999 to 2000 do not pose a major public health risk; however, should vaccine-preventable diseases be introduced into low coverage geographic areas, the accumulation of susceptible persons might serve as a reservoir to disseminate diseases.

Reduced vaccination coverage may be the result of missed opportunities to vaccinate and incomplete or scattered vaccination records.6,7 Some states and counties have compiled population-based, computerized registries that contain vaccination information on nearly all preschool-aged children. These registries enable providers to identify children who are due for vaccinations and to automatically review a child's vaccination history to determine the vaccines needed on a particular visit.

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, NIS is a telephone survey; although statistical adjustments compensate for nonresponse and nontelephone households, and other potential sources of bias, some bias might remain. Second, NIS relies on provider-verified vaccination histories. The completeness of provider records and data provided to NIS is unknown. Third, because of sampling uncertainly in NIS, particularly on the subnational level, results should be interpreted with caution.

Standards for pediatric vaccination practices that first were recommended in 1992 by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee8 and were endorsed by medical professional organizations are being revised to reflect a largely privatized vaccination delivery system with improved public financing for vulnerable children through the Vaccines for Children program and an emphasis on adolescent vaccination. State and local vaccination programs and public and private vaccination providers should continue to use reminders and recalls, vaccinate at every opportunity, and administer multiple vaccinations when indicated to ensure the highest possible coverage among preschool-aged children.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

*Jefferson County, Alabama; Maricopa County, Arizona; Los Angeles, San Diego County, and Santa Clara, California; District of Columbia (DC); Dade and Duval counties, Florida; Fulton/DeKalb County, Georgia; Chicago, Illinois; Marion County, Indiana; Orleans Parish, Louisiana; Baltimore, Maryland; Boston, Massachusetts; Detroit, Michigan; Newark, New Jersey; New York, New York; Cuyahoga and Franklin counties, Ohio; Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania; Davidson and Shelby counties, Tennessee; Bexar, Dallas, and El Paso counties, and Houston, Texas; King County, Washington; and Milwaukee County, Wisconsin.
†For this reporting period (January-December 2000), NIS included children born during February 1997-May 1999.
‡Range of state-specific coverage during 2000—4:3:1:3 combination: 68.2%-86.9%; 4:3:1:3:3 combination: 63.5%-82.8%. DTaP3: ≥90%; DTaP4: 72.8%-91.6%. OPV3, 1MMR, and HepB3: ≥85% except in a few states. Hib3: ≥90% except in three states. Variation in coverage was greatest among children who had received one dose of varicella vaccine: 38.0%-84.5% (estimate).
§All MMWR references are available on the Internet at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr. Use the search function to find specific articles.

REFERENCES

CDC, Ten great public health achievements—United States, 1900-1999. MMWR. 1999;48241- 3
Zell  EREzzati-Rice  TMBattaglia  MPWright  RA National immunization survey: the methodology of a vaccination surveillance system. Pub Health Rep. 2000;11565- 77
Link to Article
Smith  PJBattaglia  MPHuggins  V  et al.  Overview of the sampling design and statistical methods used in the National Immunization Survey. Am J Prev Med. 2001;2017- 24
Link to Article
CDC, National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19-35 months—United States, 1999. MMWR. 2000;49585- 9
CDC, Reported vaccine-preventable diseases—United States, 1993, and the Childhood Immunization Initiative. MMWR. 1994;4357- 60
Cordero  JFOrenstein  WA The future of immunization registries. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13S122- S124
Santoli  JMSzilagyi  PGRodewald  LE Barriers to immunization and missed opportunities. Pediatric Annals. 1998;27366- 74
US Department of Health and Human Services, Standards for pediatric immunization practices.  Washington, DC US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service1992;

Figures

Tables

References

CDC, Ten great public health achievements—United States, 1900-1999. MMWR. 1999;48241- 3
Zell  EREzzati-Rice  TMBattaglia  MPWright  RA National immunization survey: the methodology of a vaccination surveillance system. Pub Health Rep. 2000;11565- 77
Link to Article
Smith  PJBattaglia  MPHuggins  V  et al.  Overview of the sampling design and statistical methods used in the National Immunization Survey. Am J Prev Med. 2001;2017- 24
Link to Article
CDC, National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19-35 months—United States, 1999. MMWR. 2000;49585- 9
CDC, Reported vaccine-preventable diseases—United States, 1993, and the Childhood Immunization Initiative. MMWR. 1994;4357- 60
Cordero  JFOrenstein  WA The future of immunization registries. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13S122- S124
Santoli  JMSzilagyi  PGRodewald  LE Barriers to immunization and missed opportunities. Pediatric Annals. 1998;27366- 74
US Department of Health and Human Services, Standards for pediatric immunization practices.  Washington, DC US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service1992;

Letters

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles