0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
msJAMA |

National Interest Waiver Eligibility for International Medical Graduates FREE

Robert D. Aronson, JD
[+] Author Affiliations

Not Available


Not Available


JAMA. 2000;283(13):1747. doi:10.1001/jama.283.13.1747-JMS0405-3-1.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Over the past 10 years, foreign national physicians have had widely varying success in applying for permanent residency status in the United States. Since 1990, one path by which these physicians have remained in the United States is to apply for national interest waivers to circumvent traditional immigration certification requirements.1 An examination of the history of these waivers reveals some of the conflicting priorities that inform the United States' immigration policies toward foreign physicians.

US immigration laws contain certain provisions that enable foreign nationals to qualify for permanent residence under the sponsorship of their employers. In most instances, employers must undergo a complex recruitment and advertising effort to prove that qualified US workers are not available to fill the position in question.2 This application process is generally complicated, time-consuming, and intense in that it requires employers to demonstrate that they are not decreasing the availability of jobs for US citizens by employing workers from abroad. Under this framework, foreign physicians are regarded primarily as a threat to the job security of US national doctors.

However, an alternate pathway to permanent residence exists on the premise that the immigration of a foreign national can carry broad benefits to the United States. A recent initiative arising from the Immigration Act of 1990, the "national interest waiver classification" pathway, has antecedents in previous legislative enactments intended to induce socially beneficial cooperative behavior.3 Under this framework, the United States recognizes that foreign physicians willing to work in medically underserved areas provide "gap-filling" services that contribute to the overall welfare of the population. Such physicians can apply to be excused from the traditional certification process if they provide documentation that it is in the "national interest" of the United States to admit them as permanent residents.

Starting in 1998, however, there emerged a growing pattern of denials of national interest waiver cases involving foreign physicians. These denials were based on the argument that foreign national physicians who worked in medically underserved communities were providing a local rather than a national service,4 or that these physicians needed to work more than the 3 years stipulated for J-1 exchange-visit visas in order to make a true and lasting impact on the community.5 This policy change coincided with the appearance of work force reports arguing that IMGs departed prematurely from at-risk communities, as well as a growing movement in the US medical community advocating more rigid policies toward foreign physicians.6,7

This resistance eventually matured into a consistent denial of national interest waiver requests filed on behalf of foreign physicians as set forth in Matter of New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). After NYSDOT, the Immigration and Naturalization Service stated categorically that "there is no indication in the legislative history, statute, regulations, or binding legal precedent that physicians as a group are exempt from the labor certification requirement."8 Thereafter, employers seeking to recruit foreign physicians were forced to go through the traditional application process with attendant delays, uncertainty, and complexity. This situation created a particularly difficult situation for employers with special recruitment needs, such as those located in designated medically underserved communities or in facilities under the jurisdiction of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Quite recently, Congress' concern about patterns of physician distribution has given rise to legislation entitled the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999, which addresses the shortage of nurses and physicians in designated areas of the United States.9 Signed into law by President Clinton on November 12, 1999, this bill is the culmination of a decade of debate on the role of immigration policies in serving the nation's health care agenda. As a result, physicians working within designated medically underserved areas and/or within the Veterans Affairs' system can again qualify for a national interest waiver.

The crux of this proposal is that physicians working in medically underserved areas provide a national service by alleviating the maldistribution of physicians in the United States. This measure does not create an unqualified entitlement to permanent resident status, as foreign physicians must fulfill a 5-year service commitment to a medically underserved area prior to obtaining permanent resident status. Nevertheless, it is the hope of workforce analysts that it will facilitate the recruitment and retention of physicians in areas that have been underserved by the health care system.

REFERENCES

Not Available, Not Available Pub L No. 101-649, 104 Stat 4978.
Not Available, Not Available 56 Federal Register. 54928 (1991) (codified at 20 CFR δ 656.21).
Yanni  PR Re-railing the train: the true meaning of national interest. Murphy  RP  et al. eds.AILA Immigration and Naturalization Handbook. Vol 2 Washington, DC American Immigration Lawyers Association1998;
Not Available, Matter of (name not provided), WAC 98 11555076, California RSC (1998).
Not Available, Matter of (name not provided), WAC 98 08053742, California RSC (1998).
Council on Graduate Medical Education, 1997 Recommendation to the Congress and the Secretary of Health and Human Services on Graduate Medical Education Payment Reform.  Washington, DC US Dept of Health and Human Services1997;
Institute of Medicine, The Nation's Physician Workforce.  Washington, DC National Academy Press1996;
Not Available, Matter of (name not provided), A75385.
Not Available, Not Available Pub L No. 106-95, 113 Stat 1312.

Figures

Tables

References

Not Available, Not Available Pub L No. 101-649, 104 Stat 4978.
Not Available, Not Available 56 Federal Register. 54928 (1991) (codified at 20 CFR δ 656.21).
Yanni  PR Re-railing the train: the true meaning of national interest. Murphy  RP  et al. eds.AILA Immigration and Naturalization Handbook. Vol 2 Washington, DC American Immigration Lawyers Association1998;
Not Available, Matter of (name not provided), WAC 98 11555076, California RSC (1998).
Not Available, Matter of (name not provided), WAC 98 08053742, California RSC (1998).
Council on Graduate Medical Education, 1997 Recommendation to the Congress and the Secretary of Health and Human Services on Graduate Medical Education Payment Reform.  Washington, DC US Dept of Health and Human Services1997;
Institute of Medicine, The Nation's Physician Workforce.  Washington, DC National Academy Press1996;
Not Available, Matter of (name not provided), A75385.
Not Available, Not Available Pub L No. 106-95, 113 Stat 1312.
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

66 Views
3 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
×