0
Book and Media Reviews |

Controversies in Treating Diabetes: Clinical and Research Aspects

Hylton V. Joffe, MD, MMSc
JAMA. 2009;301(15):1602-1608. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.499.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

As an endocrinologist, I have educated countless patients with diabetes mellitus about the importance of maintaining good glycemic control. Indeed, currently there is no dispute that inadequate glycemic control contributes to some of the long-term complications of diabetes. However, not too long ago, it was controversial whether lowering blood glucose levels in patients with diabetes would have any beneficial effects.

Medicine is filled with such controversies, which usually result from insufficient or conflicting data, and the field of diabetes is no exception. Currently, the scientific community is divided on whether rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, increases the risk of myocardial ischemic events. This finding is based on a meta-analysis of short-term clinical trials and has not been confirmed in longer-term clinical trials. In 2008, a large clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk reported an unexpected finding of increased mortality among patients randomized to undergo near-normal glycemic control compared with those randomized to undergo conventional glycemic control. In contrast, intensive glycemic control did not increase mortality in 2 other recently completed clinical trials.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs