We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Patient-Physician Shared Decision Making—Reply

Steven J. Katz, MD, MPH1; Sarah Hawley, PhD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
JAMA. 2014;311(8):864. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.285166.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply Similar to Mr Veroff and colleagues, we are strong proponents of shared decision making between clinicians and their patients, including incorporating values and preferences into treatment decisions. We lead a research program funded by the National Cancer Institute to address better ways to do this, including developing and evaluating new patient-centered deliberation tools.1

However, in our Viewpoint we concluded that the literature does not support the role of shared decision making in reducing overtreatment and medical cost inflation. We established that there were important flaws in a frequently cited Cochrane meta-analysis that suggested that patient decision aids were associated with less extensive surgical treatment. The letter from Veroff and colleagues further highlights the challenges of disentangling patient vs clinician influences on utilization in studies assessing the effect of shared decision making on cost and treatment patterns.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




February 26, 2014
David R. Veroff, MPP; John D. Birkmeyer, MD; David E. Wennberg, MD, MPH
1Health Dialog, Boston, Massachusetts
2University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor
3Northern New England Accountable Care Collaborative, Portland, Maine
JAMA. 2014;311(8):863. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.285157.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...