We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Book and Media Reviews |

Dark Medicine: Rationalizing Unethical Medical Research

Preeti N. Malani, MD, MSJ, Reviewer
JAMA. 2008;300(10):1217-1218. doi:10.1001/jama.300.10.1217.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


“Where does one set the limits on research involving human subjects?” This fundamental question is addressed by a remarkable collection of essays in Dark Medicine: Rationalizing Unethical Medical Research. Framed by the belief that unethical research is not simply a problem of the past, Dark Medicine lends thoughtful historical context to the discussion of modern-day dilemmas. The result is a unique fusion of philosophy, religion, history, and bioethics.

The initial idea for Dark Medicine developed out of discussions among the 3 editors, who recognized an urgent need to address the questions they raise in the book. The trio identified a diverse group of scholars who eventually gathered at the University of Pennsylvania during the spring of 2004. The final product contains 16 essays written by German, Japanese, and US authors, with individual selections concentrating on World War II crimes, postwar issues, and present-day challenges. In the introduction, editor William R. LeFleur notes that “The focus of this volume is not so much on the history of the episodes of dark medical research . . . as it is on how much research was rationalized—precisely because the patterns of rationalization are more likely to show up again in our own time than are the specifics of past actions.” This theme of “rationalization” is repeatedly highlighted in the pages of Dark Medicine.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.