We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Book and Media Reviews |

Biomedical Ethics: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Moral Issues in Medicine and Biology

Stephen Workman, MD, MSc, Reviewer
JAMA. 2008;300(8):967. doi:10.1001/jama.300.8.967.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Biomedical Ethics contains more than 100 essays previously published in the journal Medical Ethics, many with commentaries and responses. Overall, the book is a satisfying read that presents many different complex ethical problems in an engaging manner. Many of the dilemmas highlight just how complicated bioethics and medical science have become in the 21st century. For example, one essay analyzes the case of a 42-year-old infertile woman who wishes to become pregnant via in vitro fertilization (IVF) using a donated egg. To maintain a genetic link to her child, she requests that her 70-year-old father be the sperm donor. (Genetically, the child would be her half brother.) The IVF staff is concerned that the pregnancy will constitute a forme fruste of incest. Arthur Wolf examines this question and concludes that the only reason not to perform the procedure is the moral repugnance on the part of the clinic staff and that this repugnance alone does not justify a refusal. His conclusion, however, overlooks the significantly increased risk of developmental abnormalities that arise with increasing paternal age and with IVF. Such is the problem with ethical dilemmas; often the complexity of reality ends up confounding a perfectly good analysis.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.