0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Assessing Competencies of Knowledge and Process Improvement

Marvin A. Dewar, MD, JD
JAMA. 2008;299(19):2276-2277. doi:10.1001/jama.299.19.2276-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

To the Editor: In their Commentary, Dr Holmboe and colleagues1 effectively reinforced the point that up-to-date and robust medical knowledge, as well as accurate and effective knowledge synthesis and problem solving, are key to high-quality and effective physician performance. Assessing substantive medical knowledge is an integral part of licensure and specialty certification. Unfortunately, maintaining a high level of medical knowledge and effective clinical judgment skills is presented as being a distinct endeavor from efforts to promote better health outcomes by improving clinical processes at the microsystem level. Distinguishing the substantive medical knowledge domain from the process improvement domain fits the traditional model of separating the activity of direct patient care from the activity of clinical process improvement. In this approach, the former is performed by clinicians in the clinical examination room, while the latter is usually directed by quality improvement professionals who develop system and process changes designed to improve the clinical substrate where care is delivered.

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

May 21, 2008
Eric S. Holmboe, MD; Rebecca Lipner, PhD; Ann Greiner, MCP
JAMA. 2008;299(19):2276-2277. doi:10.1001/jama.299.19.2276-b.
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();