We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Lymph Node Examination Rate, Survival Rate, and Quality of Care in Colon Cancer—Reply

Sandra L. Wong, MD, MS; John D. Birkmeyer, MD
JAMA. 2008;299(8):896-898. doi:10.1001/jama.299.8.897.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply: Although we found no evidence that hospitals examining more lymph nodes after colectomy for colon cancer had better overall survival rates, both Dr Bilimoria and colleagues and Dr Peters and colleagues suggest that node counts may be particularly important in patients found to have node-negative disease. In our study, hospitals in the highest node count quartile had better survival rates among patients with stage II disease than hospitals in the lowest quartile. Patient-level analyses were conducted as a part of this study, although our focus was assessing lymph node examination rates at the hospital level. Peters et al request additional patient-level survival analysis. Consistent with other patient-level studies, we had reported that examination of at least 12 nodes was associated with improved survival. That association was stronger in patients found to have node-negative disease (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.80) compared with patients with node-positive disease (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.98).


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




February 27, 2008
Elke Peters, MD; Iris D. Nagtegaal, MD, PhD; Cornelius J. H. van de Velde, MD, PhD; J. Han van Krieken, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2008;299(8):896-898. doi:10.1001/jama.299.8.896-b.
February 27, 2008
Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD; Andrew K. Stewart, MA; Stephen B. Edge, MD; Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS
JAMA. 2008;299(8):896-898. doi:10.1001/jama.299.8.896-a.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.