We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Lymph Node Examination Rate, Survival Rate, and Quality of Care in Colon Cancer

Elke Peters, MD; Iris D. Nagtegaal, MD, PhD; Cornelius J. H. van de Velde, MD, PhD; J. Han van Krieken, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2008;299(8):896-898. doi:10.1001/jama.299.8.896-b.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor: In the study of hospital lymph node examination rates by Dr Wong and colleagues,1 it was suggested that the number of lymph nodes examined is not relevant as a hospital quality indicator, whereas on the patient level the number of analyzed lymph nodes remains an important tool to assess outcome. We believe that this seemingly discrepant result can be explained by focusing on patients with N0 status. This retrospective study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare linked database and included patients aged 65 years or older with colon cancer undergoing colectomy. Patient survival was assessed and categorized according to hospital performance based on the proportion of patients in whom at least 12 lymph nodes were examined. The survival analyses showed that the examination of more than 12 lymph nodes was not associated with improved survival. This is in contrast with previous studies and with many international guidelines for staging of patients.2 These results would suggest that the effort to find more lymph nodes is unnecessary. We believe the discrepancies are the result of patient selection.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




February 27, 2008
Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD; Andrew K. Stewart, MA; Stephen B. Edge, MD; Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS
JAMA. 2008;299(8):896-898. doi:10.1001/jama.299.8.896-a.
February 27, 2008
Sandra L. Wong, MD, MS; John D. Birkmeyer, MD
JAMA. 2008;299(8):896-898. doi:10.1001/jama.299.8.897.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.