We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Lymph Node Examination Rate, Survival Rate, and Quality of Care in Colon Cancer

Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD; Andrew K. Stewart, MA; Stephen B. Edge, MD; Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS
JAMA. 2008;299(8):896-898. doi:10.1001/jama.299.8.896-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor: In their study examining the association of hospital nodal evaluation rates and survival after colectomy for cancer, Dr Wong and colleagues1 concluded that examination of increasing numbers of lymph nodes is not associated with survival at the hospital level and that evaluation of 12 or more lymph nodes is not a useful quality measure.

However, their data actually demonstrate a significant improvement in survival in a key population. Table 3 shows a survival advantage for stage II patients treated at hospitals with high lymph node examination rates (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.96). The patients who would benefit most from having 12 or more nodes examined are stage II patients who have had an inadequate number of lymph nodes examined to confidently deem them free of nodal metastases. These understaged patients would fail to receive the potentially lifesaving benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy.2 When examined in a single model combining all stage groups, the benefit of examining increasing numbers of nodes is diluted by the lesser effect in stage 0, I, and III patients. Lymph node evaluation is so poor nationally that in the hospitals with the highest nodal examination rates, the median is only 13 nodes (Table 1), leaving more than 25% of patients at these hospitals potentially understaged and further blunting the potential survival benefit expected in a group of patients who all have 12 or more nodes examined.


Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





February 27, 2008
Sandra L. Wong, MD, MS; John D. Birkmeyer, MD
JAMA. 2008;299(8):896-898. doi:10.1001/jama.299.8.897.
February 27, 2008
Elke Peters, MD; Iris D. Nagtegaal, MD, PhD; Cornelius J. H. van de Velde, MD, PhD; J. Han van Krieken, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2008;299(8):896-898. doi:10.1001/jama.299.8.896-b.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 7

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.