We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Physician Payment Incentives to Improve Care Quality

David U. Himmelstein, MD1; Steffie Woolhandler, MD, MPH1
[+] Author Affiliations
1City University of New York School of Public Health, New York, New York
JAMA. 2014;311(3):304. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284475.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor The analysis by Dr Bardach and colleagues1 of pay-for-performance incentives rests on data recorded by clinicians. But only the incentivized group had reason to put a positive spin on their numbers. Subtle manipulation could easily bias their results.

For instance, colleagues of ours speak of clinic managers who have coached them to change their digit preference when recording blood pressure levels from 140 mm Hg to 139 mm Hg. In other cases, administrators have discouraged further monitoring (until the next pay-for-performance incentive year) once a goal blood pressure level or hemoglobin A1C has been recorded. Either strategy would distort Bardach et al’s blood pressure results. Their process of care measures are even easier to undermine. Notably, their outcome measure (cholesterol level), which is harder to game, showed no improvement.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




January 15, 2014
Naomi S. Bardach, MD, MAS; Sarah C. Shih, MPH; R. Adams Dudley, MD, MBA
1Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco
2New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York
3Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
JAMA. 2014;311(3):304. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284478.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...