We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Capitol Health Call |

GAO: Better Coordination Needed to Avoid Duplicate Autism Research

Mike Mitka, MSJ
JAMA. 2014;311(2):128. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.285753.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The vast majority of autism research projects funded by federal agencies are potentially duplicative, reported the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

About 84% of autism research projects funded with $1.4 billion from 12 federal agencies in fiscal years 2008 through 2012 had the potential to duplicate each other’s efforts, according to a GAO report released November 20 (http://1.usa.gov/1coeccB).

The Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC), created through passage of the Combating Autism Act of 2006, is supposed to coordinate the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) autism research and activities, monitor all federal autism activities (such as disseminating information or running awareness campaigns), and create and annually update a strategic plan for autism research. However, the GAO reported IACC was limited in its ability to monitor and coordinate research because it used outdated, inconsistent, incomplete data that were not tracked over time. The GAO recommended that HHS improve the usefulness of IACC data to better coordinate and monitor federal autism activities. The GAO said that HHS disagreed and claimed that it was already making adequate efforts. All federal agencies but the Department of Defense disputed that any duplication occurs.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles