We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Suicides Among Military Personnel

Remington L. Nevin, MD, MPH1; Elspeth Cameron Ritchie, MD, MPH2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
2District of Columbia Department of Mental Health, Washington, DC
JAMA. 2013;310(23):2563-2564. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282692.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor The study by Ms LeardMann and colleagues1 evaluated 83 suicides occurring among 151 560 military personnel over 707 493 person-years for predictors of suicide risk.

The Millennium Cohort Study (MCS), on which the analysis of LeardMann et al was based, is not a representative sample of recent US military personnel and has a significant sampling bias relative to risk factors for suicide. Phase 1 had a 36% response rate and its enrollees “were demographically older, more educated, married, and in the officer ranks, compared with individuals in the invited sample or the military population at large.”2 Of the approximately 350 000 personnel invited to enroll in phases 2 and 3, only 21% and 22% enrolled, respectively. Compared with invitees, enrollees in phases 2 and 3 had 77% to 91% higher odds of being female and 57% to 90% higher odds of being in noncombat military specialties.3


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




December 18, 2013
Charles W. Hoge, MD; Cynthia A. LeardMann, MPH; Edward J. Boyko, MD, MPH
1Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland
2Deployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California
3Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
JAMA. 2013;310(23):2565-2566. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282701.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...