0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letter |

Publication of Results of Abstracts Presented at Medical Education Conferences FREE

Catharine M. Walsh, MD, MEd, FRCPC1; Many Fung2; Shiphra Ginsburg, MD, MEd, FRCPC1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
JAMA. 2013;310(21):2307-2309. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281671.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Conferences represent an important forum for presentation of scholarly activity; however, dissemination beyond meeting registrants is limited. Peer-reviewed publication facilitates knowledge translation,1 and failure to publish may lead to unnecessary duplication and publication bias that can compromise future scholarship.2 This study aimed to determine the rate and time course of peer-reviewed journal publication of abstracts presented at the 2 largest North American medical education conferences (Research in Medical Education Conference [RIME] and the Canadian Conference on Medical Education [CCME]) and to identify characteristics associated with publication.

All 455 abstracts from the 2005 and 2006 RIME and CCME conferences were reviewed. Six were excluded (4 withdrawn, 1 missing, 2 published before abstract deadline). Blinded to publication status, 2 investigators (C.M.W. and M.F.) extracted the following information: format (oral or poster), type of scholarship (research, evaluation of a program or innovation, or other), methods (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed), completion status (completed or work in progress), number of centers involved, and degrees and institutions of the authors.

MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, and Google Scholar were searched (from inception through November 2012) using the names of the first, second, and last author, followed by keywords from the title, abstract, or both. Retrieved peer-reviewed publications were compared with the corresponding abstract to ensure it represented the same work. Two investigators recorded journal type (educational or other), funding source, publication type (full-length or abbreviated article), and publication date.

Associations between publication status and all other parameters were analyzed by simple logistic regression using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc). Multivariable analysis was conducted using all variables from bivariable screening with P < .10. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 (2-sided).

Of the 449 abstracts, 156 (34.7%) were subsequently published (RIME: 86/232; CCME: 70/217); 149 (95.5%) were full-length articles. Funding was acknowledged in 81 (51.9%). Median time to publication was 20 months (interquartile range, 10-30 months), ranging from 9 months preconference (but after the submission deadline) to 76 months postconference. More than 90% were published within 4 years (Figure). Publications appeared in 46 different journals and 73.1% were in educationally focused journals.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Distribution of Published Abstracts by Time Since Conference
Graphic Jump Location

In bivariable analysis, publication was more likely for findings from abstracts describing research studies compared with other scholarly activities (38.9% vs 19.4%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 2.64 [95% CI, 1.38-5.06]; P = .003), and those including a last author with a PhD (44.3% vs 31.6%; OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.00-2.97]; P = .049). In multivariable analysis, subsequent publication was more frequent for oral abstracts (48.5% vs 26.8% for poster abstracts; OR, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.45-3.61]; P < .001) and those outlining completed work (41.7% vs 22.0% for work in progress; OR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.05-3.76]; P = .03) (Table). Quantitative studies were published less frequently than mixed-methods studies (35.8% vs 55.6%, respectively; OR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.19-0.87]; P = .02) and least frequently overall. Multi-institutional authorship also predicted publication (50.8% vs 29.0% for single center; OR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.29-3.48]; P = .003).

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable.  Characteristics of Abstracts Associated With Publication of Results

The subsequent publication rate of abstracts presented at medical education conferences was 34.7%, well below the mean (44.5%) reported for biomedical research.3 One reason may be that educational scholarship is conceptualized more broadly than traditional research4 and presentation at conferences may obviate the need for journal publication because it already constitutes dissemination by making innovations visible and available for others to build on.5 Many of the significant predictive variables, such as oral presentation format and completed works, may be surrogate markers for study quality. We were surprised that quantitative abstracts were least likely to be subsequently published because quantitative methods are most commonly used.

In terms of limitations, our results cannot be generalized beyond the 2 conferences included. Given the word constraints of abstracts, potential misclassification of studies may have occurred and other important predictors (eg, education level) may have been missed. Additionally, author degrees were not available for CCME and therefore could not be included in multivariable analysis. To move the field forward, it is important to develop a robust literature to document emerging innovations and elevate the relevance and value of educational scholarship. Future research is planned to determine barriers to publication to help mitigate them.

Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Senior Editor.

Corresponding Author: Shiphra Ginsburg, MD, MEd, FRCPC, Wilson Centre for Research in Education, 600 University Ave, Ste 433, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada (shiphra.ginsburg@utoronto.ca).

Author Contributions: Dr Walsh had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Walsh, Ginsburg.

Acquisition of data: Walsh, Fung, Ginsburg.

Analysis and interpretation of data: Walsh, Ginsburg.

Drafting of the manuscript: Walsh.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Walsh, Fung, Ginsburg.

Statistical analysis: Walsh.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Fung, Ginsburg.

Study supervision: Ginsburg.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.

Funding/Support: Dr Walsh was funded by a Canadian Institute of Health Research Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program doctoral fellowship and a Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Paediatrics fellowship grant.

Role of the Sponsor: The Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Hospital for Sick Children had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Previous Presentation: The abstract of an earlier version of this article was presented as a poster at the 2012 Association of American Medical Colleges’ Research in Medical Education Meeting.

Additional Contributions: We gratefully acknowledge Peter Church, MD (Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), for assistance with data analysis. Dr Church did not receive compensation.

Yoon  U, Knobloch  K.  Assessment of reporting quality of conference abstracts in sports injury prevention according to CONSORT and STROBE criteria and their subsequent publication rate as full papers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:47.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Sackett  D, Straus  SE, Richardson  SW, Rosenberg  W, Haynes  BR. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM.2nd ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
Scherer  RW, Langenberg  P, von Elm  E.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2(2):MR000005.
PubMed
Boyer  EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990.
Simpson  D, Fincher  RM, Hafler  JP,  et al.  Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship. Med Educ. 2007;41(10):1002-1009.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Distribution of Published Abstracts by Time Since Conference
Graphic Jump Location

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable.  Characteristics of Abstracts Associated With Publication of Results

References

Yoon  U, Knobloch  K.  Assessment of reporting quality of conference abstracts in sports injury prevention according to CONSORT and STROBE criteria and their subsequent publication rate as full papers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:47.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Sackett  D, Straus  SE, Richardson  SW, Rosenberg  W, Haynes  BR. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM.2nd ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
Scherer  RW, Langenberg  P, von Elm  E.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2(2):MR000005.
PubMed
Boyer  EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990.
Simpson  D, Fincher  RM, Hafler  JP,  et al.  Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship. Med Educ. 2007;41(10):1002-1009.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Letters

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles