0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letter |

State Repayment Programs for Health Care Education Loans FREE

Donald E. Pathman, MD, MPH1; Lynda Goldberg, MBA, MSPH2,4; Thomas R. Konrad, PhD1; Jennifer Craft Morgan, PhD3,5
[+] Author Affiliations
1Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
2Ohio State University, Columbus
3Gerontology Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta
4Ms Goldberg worked at the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, when this study’s survey was conducted
5Dr Morgan worked in the Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, when this study’s survey was conducted
JAMA. 2013;310(18):1982-1984. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281644.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Repayment of loans for health care education is a popular incentive among states to attract clinicians to underserved areas. As of 1996, 37 states offered loan repayment programs for primary care clinicians, co-sponsored loan repayment programs with the State Loan Repayment Program of the National Health Service Corps (NHSC), or offered both programs.1 Seven states also offered direct financial incentive programs, which are like loan repayment programs but allow clinicians flexibility in using program funds. In this study, we identified all state loan repayment and direct financial incentive programs for health professionals of all types as of 2010, described changes in program numbers from 2007 to 2010 during the first years of the worldwide recession with tight state budgets, and characterized the disciplines and size of the collective workforce by state.

We identified state programs by searching all available online compendia of programs,2,3 under the terms “loan repayment” and each state’s name, websites of known programs,1 and websites of key recruitment offices by state. Program directors were contacted when program eligibility was uncertain. Eligible programs (1) provided loan repayment or direct financial incentives during the study period to any health professionals (apart from nurses solely below the master’s level) and (2) required clinical service in underserved communities or practices.

We e-mailed questionnaires to all program directors of identified programs, which asked about changes in funding during the 4-year study period and requested tabulation of clinicians by each discipline serving in 2010. Nearly complete survey responses were received from 96 of 99 eligible programs (97%). Missing clinician count data were estimated for 1 or more missing disciplines in 8 programs (9%) using other information from questionnaires (eg, workforce figures for earlier years; n = 5 programs), secondary data (eg, a program report available online; n = 1 program), and a combination of these sources (n = 2 programs).

States offered a total of 93 programs in 2010; 55 were solely state-funded loan repayment programs, 27 were joint state and NHSC loan repayment programs, and 11 were direct financial incentive programs (Table). The number of programs increased from 87 in 2007, with 12 programs created and 6 programs losing all funding (another 6 programs lost then regained funding after 1 or 2 years). All states except Florida, Hawaii, and Mississippi offered at least 1 program during this period.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable.  State Programs Combined Workforce Numbers in 2010 by Discipline and Type of Programa

A total of 3325 clinicians served in state programs as of 2010, with 1288 physicians constituting the single largest discipline (Table). Solely state-funded loan repayment programs fielded the largest workforce with 2284 clinicians, and they supported the highest number and proportion of mental health practitioners among the 3 program types. The number of participating clinicians varied across states from 2 to 488 (Figure).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Types of Programs and Total Clinician Counts in Each State, 2010
Graphic Jump Location

Loan repayment programs play a prominent role in efforts by states to meet the health workforce needs of underserved communities. Generally, they weathered the first years of the worldwide recession with modest growth in total program numbers. The 1395 primary care clinicians (physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse midwives) serving in solely state-funded loan repayment and direct incentive programs in 2010 was a large increase from the 777 primary care clinicians serving in these programs in 1996.1

Like the NHSC,4 state programs support a diverse workforce. The combined workforce of 3325 primary care, mental health, and dental health clinicians in state programs in 2010 was larger than the 2500 clinicians in the NHSC’s federal loan repayment program in 2008, but about half of the federal program’s 7200 clinicians in 2010 following its rapid expansion under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.4,5 For perspective, another 16 125 clinicians are currently needed within Health Professional Shortage Areas.6

Study limitations are that our search may have overlooked a few eligible programs, and clinician participant counts are self-reported by programs and some include our data-derived estimates.

Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Senior Editor.

Corresponding Author: Donald E. Pathman, MD, MPH, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, 725 Martin Luther King Blvd, UNC CB#7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 (don_pathman@unc.edu).

Author Contributions: Dr Pathman had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Pathman, Goldberg, Konrad, Morgan.

Acquisition of data: Pathman, Goldberg.

Analysis and interpretation of data: Pathman, Konrad, Morgan.

Drafting of the manuscript: Pathman.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Pathman, Goldberg, Konrad, Morgan.

Statistical analysis: Pathman, Konrad.

Obtained funding: Pathman.

Study supervision: Pathman.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Pathman reported serving on the National Advisory Council of the National Health Service Corps from 2009 to 2012; serving as a consultant to the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services Primary Care Office in 2012; and receiving reimbursement for travel expenses from the National Rural Recruitment and Retention Network. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This project was funded through cooperative agreement 5U1CRH03714-04-00 from the US Office of Rural Health Policy.

Role of the Sponsor: The US Office of Rural Health Policy had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Pathman  DE, Taylor  DH  Jr, Konrad  TR,  et al.  State scholarship, loan forgiveness, and related programs: the unheralded safety net. JAMA. 2000;284(16):2084-2092.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Association of American Medical Colleges. Loan repayment/forgiveness and scholarship programs. https://services.aamc.org/fed_loan_pub/index.cfm?fuseaction=public.welcome&CFID=7563505. Accessed August 19, 2013.
Rural Assistance Center. Funding by type: loan repayment programs. http://www.raconline.org/funding/type_details.php?type=Loan Repayment Programs. Accessed August 19, 2013.
Pathman  DE, Konrad  TR.  Growth and changes in the National Health Service Corps (NHSC) workforce with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(5):723-733.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
US Department of Health and Human Services; Health Resources and Services Administration. FY 2012 online performance appendix. http://www.hrsa.gov/about/budget/performanceappendix2012.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2013.
US Department of Health and Human Services Data Warehouse. Designated health professional shortage areas statistics: third quarter of fiscal year 2013 designated HPSA quarterly summary. http://datawarehouse.hrsa.gov/quickaccessreports.aspx. Accessed August 26, 2013.

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Types of Programs and Total Clinician Counts in Each State, 2010
Graphic Jump Location

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable.  State Programs Combined Workforce Numbers in 2010 by Discipline and Type of Programa

References

Pathman  DE, Taylor  DH  Jr, Konrad  TR,  et al.  State scholarship, loan forgiveness, and related programs: the unheralded safety net. JAMA. 2000;284(16):2084-2092.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Association of American Medical Colleges. Loan repayment/forgiveness and scholarship programs. https://services.aamc.org/fed_loan_pub/index.cfm?fuseaction=public.welcome&CFID=7563505. Accessed August 19, 2013.
Rural Assistance Center. Funding by type: loan repayment programs. http://www.raconline.org/funding/type_details.php?type=Loan Repayment Programs. Accessed August 19, 2013.
Pathman  DE, Konrad  TR.  Growth and changes in the National Health Service Corps (NHSC) workforce with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(5):723-733.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
US Department of Health and Human Services; Health Resources and Services Administration. FY 2012 online performance appendix. http://www.hrsa.gov/about/budget/performanceappendix2012.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2013.
US Department of Health and Human Services Data Warehouse. Designated health professional shortage areas statistics: third quarter of fiscal year 2013 designated HPSA quarterly summary. http://datawarehouse.hrsa.gov/quickaccessreports.aspx. Accessed August 26, 2013.
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com