We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Mortality Reporting and Pay-for-Performance Programs

Jamieson M. Bourque, MD, MHS1; Ashley R. Hurst, JD, MDiv2; Mary Faith Marshall, PhD3
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville
2Center for Biomedical Ethics and Humanities, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville
3Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville
JAMA. 2013;310(13):1404-1405. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.277981.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor In his Viewpoint, Dr Kupfer1 challenged the utility of 30-day mortality reporting and its use in pay-for-performance programs. He cautioned that the 24-hour rule, which excludes patients who elect hospice during the first 24 hours of an index admission from 30-day mortality statistics, may encourage overuse of hospice services. We believe that logistics and sound communication with patients or surrogates will limit this consequence. We caution against the opposite effect: the underuse of hospice and palliative care services. Once the first 24 hours have passed, there may be an incentive for physicians to pursue life-prolonging interventions (irrespective of their clinical effectiveness) past the 30-day mark to avoid the consequences of a qualifying mortality event.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




October 2, 2013
Joel M. Kupfer, MD
1Department of Cardiology, Methodist Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois
JAMA. 2013;310(13):1405. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.277987.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Related Collections