Letters |

Prehospital Airway Management for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest—Reply

Kohei Hasegawa, MD, MPH; Atsushi Hiraide, MD, PhD; David F. M. Brown, MD
JAMA. 2013;309(18):1888-1890. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.3107.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply: As we indicated in our article, our study did not collect information on the process of advanced airway management, which would require independent observers. This information would have been beneficial to assess the potential mechanisms between airway management and survival outcomes. In contrast, our nationwide study reflects the effectiveness of advanced airway management in the setting of current practice in a developed nation.

We agree with Dr Bernhard and colleagues that advanced airway techniques may be superior to conventional bag-valve-mask ventilation if one accepts the validity and generalizability of the study they cite.1 That study was a manikin study reporting superior success rates with supraglottic airway devices placed by medical students and was not a real-world assessment of airway management in the prehospital setting.

Figures in this Article


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure. Effect of Unmeasured Confounding Factors
Graphic Jump Location

The sensitivity analysis illustrates how powerful a single confounder would have to be to fully account for the disadvantage of advanced airway management over bag-valve-mask ventilation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests that was detected in the adjusted analysis.



May 8, 2013
Michael Bernhard, MD; Torben K. Becker, MD; Bernd W. Böttiger, MD
JAMA. 2013;309(18):1888. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.3098.
May 8, 2013
Tatsuya Norii, MD; Tetsuo Hatanaka, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2013;309(18):1888-1890. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.3104.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...