We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Clinical Crossroads | Conferences With Patients and Doctors| Clinician's Corner

Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer

Phillip M. Boiselle, MD
JAMA. 2013;309(11):1163-1170. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.216988.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance Low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening was shown to reduce lung cancer–specific mortality in a large randomized trial of a high-risk population. The decision to pursue CT screening for lung cancer is a timely question raised by individuals at risk of lung cancer and by their health care practitioners.

Objectives To discuss the evidence for use of chest x-rays and low-dose CT in screening for lung cancer; to describe potential benefits, harms, and uncertainties of CT screening; and to review current guidelines for CT screening.

Evidence Review MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched from 1984 to 2012. Additional citations were obtained from lists of references from select research and review articles on this topic. Evidence was graded using the American Hospital Association level of evidence guidelines.

Findings Low-dose CT screening has been associated with a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality in a large randomized controlled trial (National Lung Screening Trial [NLST]) of a high-risk population. Mortality data have not yet been reported for 5 other randomized controlled trials, and the sample sizes were too small to detect a meaningful difference in 2 other completed trials. A major risk of CT screening is a high false-positive rate, with associated risks and costs associated with follow-up CT scans and the potential for more invasive diagnostic procedures. Published guidelines for screening indicate a consensus that screening may be indicated for individuals who meet entry criteria for the NLST, but some guidelines expand their recommendations for screening beyond these criteria.

Conclusions and Relevance Individuals at high risk of lung cancer who meet the criteria for CT screening in published guidelines should participate in an informed and shared decision-making process by discussing the potential benefits, harms, and uncertainties of screening with their physicians.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1. Ms L's Low-Dose CT Screening Scans for Lung Cancer
Graphic Jump Location

Baseline lung screening computed tomography (CT) scan from 2003 (left) demonstrates a 2-mm noncalcified nodule in the right lower lobe (arrowhead) that remained stable through the time of the second annual screening CT performed in 2006 (right). Computed tomography images are displayed in lung window settings and are coned down to highlight the right lower lung.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2. Example of a False-Positive CT Lung Screening Result
Graphic Jump Location

Annual screening low-dose computed tomography (CT) scans from 2003 (left) and 2004 (right) from a patient at risk for lung cancer. The scan from 2004 shows a spiculated right lung nodule (arrowhead) that was not present in 2003. Because of high suspicion of primary lung cancer, this nodule was further evaluated by a series of tests, including positron emission tomography–CT, CT-guided needle biopsy, and follow-up CT imaging. The nodule eventually resolved on follow-up CT imaging.




You need to register in order to view this quiz.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

17 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Multimedia

Author in the Room

audio player

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
How Serious Is the Risk of Bias?

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
In a Cohort Study, Aside From the Exposure of Interest, Did the Exposed and Control Groups Start and Finish With the Same Risk for the Outcome?