We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Antibiotics for Skin Infections New Study Design and a Step Toward Shorter Course Therapy

Shira Doron, MD; Helen W. Boucher, MD
JAMA. 2013;309(6):609-611. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.604.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In this issue of JAMA, Prokocimer et al1 present the results of ESTABLISH-1 (Efficacy and Safety of 6-day Oral Tedizolid in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections vs 10-day Oral Linezolid Therapy), an international, multicenter, double-blind, phase 3, noninferiority trial comparing a 6-day course of oral tedizolid phosphate once daily with a 10-day course of oral linezolid twice daily for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). Among 667 adults with ABSSSIs randomized to treatment with tedizolid phosphate (n = 332) or linezolid (n = 335), the early clinical treatment response rates were 79.5% with tedizolid phosphate and 79.4% with linezolid, a treatment difference of 0.1% (95% CI, −6.1% to 6.2%). The sustained clinical treatment response rates at the end of treatment (day 11) were 69.3% with tedizolid phosphate and 71.9% with linezolid (a treatment difference of −2.6% [95% CI, −9.6% to 4.2%]), with the lower bounds of the 95% confidence intervals within the prespecified 10% noninferiority margin. The authors concluded that tedizolid phosphate was statistically noninferior to linezolid in achieving early clinical response after initiating therapy for ABSSSI.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Frog skin cultures secrete anti-yellow fever compounds. J Antibiot (Tokyo) Published online Apr 6, 2016;

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence to Support the Update

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence Summary and Review 1