0
Original Contribution |

Effectiveness of a Clinically Integrated e-Learning Course in Evidence-Based Medicine for Reproductive Health Training:  A Randomized Trial

Regina Kulier, MD; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, MD, PhD; Javier Zamora, PhD; M. Nieves Plana, MD; Guillermo Carroli, MD; Jose G. Cecatti, MD, PhD; Maria J. Germar, MD; Lumbiganon Pisake, MD, MS; Sunneeta Mittal, MD, FRCOG; Robert Pattinson, MD, FRCOG; Jean-Jose Wolomby-Molondo, MD; Anne-Marie Bergh, PhD; Win May, MD, PhD; Joao Paulo Souza, MD, PhD; Shawn Koppenhoefer, PhD; Khalid S. Khan, MBBS, MSc
JAMA. 2012;308(21):2218-2225. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.33640.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Context  For evidence-based practice to embed culturally in the workplace, teaching of evidence-based medicine (EBM) should be clinically integrated. In low-middle–income countries (LMICs) there is a scarcity of EBM-trained clinical tutors, lack of protected time for teaching EBM, and poor access to relevant databases in languages other than English.

Objective  To evaluate the effects of a clinically integrated e-learning EBM course incorporating the World Health Organization (WHO) Reproductive Health Library (RHL) on knowledge, skills, and educational environment compared with traditional EBM teaching.

Design, Setting, and Participants  International cluster randomized trial conducted between April 2009 and November 2010 among postgraduate trainees in obstetrics-gynecology in 7 LMICs (Argentina, Brazil, Democratic Republic of the Congo, India, Philippines, South Africa, Thailand). Each training unit was randomized to an experimental clinically integrated course consisting of e-modules using the RHL for learning activities and trainee assessments (31 clusters, 123 participants) or to a control self-directed EBM course incorporating the RHL (29 clusters, 81 participants). A facilitator with EBM teaching experience was available at all teaching units. Courses were administered for 8 weeks, with assessments at baseline and 4 weeks after course completion. The study was completed in 24 experimental clusters (98 participants) and 22 control clusters (68 participants).

Main Outcome Measures  Primary outcomes were change in EBM knowledge (score range, 0-62) and skills (score range, 0-14). Secondary outcome was educational environment (5-point Likert scale anchored between 1 [strongly agree] and 5 [strongly disagree]).

Results  At baseline, the study groups were similar in age, year of training, and EBM-related attitudes and knowledge. After the trial, the experimental group had higher mean scores in knowledge (38.1 [95% CI, 36.7 to 39.4] in the control group vs 43.1 [95% CI, 42.0 to 44.1] in the experimental group; adjusted difference, 4.9 [95% CI, 2.9 to 6.8]; P < .001) and skills (8.3 [95% CI, 7.9 to 8.7] vs 9.1 [95% CI, 8.7 to 9.4]; adjusted difference, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.1 to 1.3]; P = .02). Although there was no difference in improvement for the overall score for educational environment (6.0 [95% CI, −0.1 to 12.0] vs 13.6 [95% CI, 8.0 to 19.2]; adjusted difference, 9.6 [95% CI, −6.8 to 26.1]; P = .25), there was an associated mean improvement in the domains of general relationships and support (−0.5 [95% CI, −1.5 to 0.4] vs 0.3 [95% CI, −0.6 to 1.1]; adjusted difference, 2.3 [95% CI, 0.2 to 4.3]; P = .03) and EBM application opportunities (0.5 [95% CI, −0.7 to 1.8] vs 2.9 [95%, CI, 1.8 to 4.1]; adjusted difference, 3.3 [95% CI, 0.1 to 6.5]; P = .04).

Conclusion  In a group of LMICs, a clinically integrated e-learning EBM curriculum in reproductive health compared with a self-directed EBM course resulted in higher knowledge and skill scores and improved educational environment.

Trial Registration  anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12609000198224

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1. Study Flow
Grahic Jump Location

aRandomized clusters by country: Argentina, 2; Brazil, 9; Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1; India, 6; Philippines, 5; South Africa, 3; Thailand, 3.
bRandomized clusters by country: Argentina, 2; Brazil, 10; Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1; India, 7; Philippines, 3; South Africa, 4; Thailand, 4.
cAnalyzed clusters by country: Argentina, 1; Brazil, 8; Democratic Republic of the Congo, 0; India, 4; Philippines, 4; South Africa, 2; Thailand, 3.
dAnalyzed clusters by country: Argentina, 2; Brazil, 9; Democratic Republic of the Congo, 0; India, 5; Philippines, 3; South Africa, 3; Thailand, 2.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2. Changes in Knowledge Evaluated Using Multiple-Choice Question Scores
Grahic Jump Location

Horizontal bars in boxes indicate medians; boxes, interquartile ranges; whiskers, range excluding outliers.

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com