0
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report|

Injuries From Batteries Among Children Aged Less Than 13 Years— United States, 1995–2010 FREE

JAMA. 2012;308(16):1622-1624. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.12804.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

MMWR. 2012;34:661-666.

2 tables omitted. Available athttp://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/mm6134.pdf.

Injuries to children caused by batteries have been documented in the medical literature and by poison control centers for decades.1, 2 Of particular concern is the ingestion of button batteries,* especially those ≥20 mm in diameter (coin size), which can lodge in the esophagus, leading to serious complications or death.3-5 To estimate the number of nonfatal battery injuries among children aged <13 years, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) staff analyzed 1997–2010 data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). To identify fatal battery exposures, other CPSC databases covering 1995–2010 were examined, including the 1) Injury and Potential Injury Incident File; 2) Death Certificate Database (DTHS); and 3) In-Depth Investigation File (INDP). From 1997 to 2010, an estimated 40,400 children aged <13 years were treated in hospital emergency departments (EDs) for battery-related injuries, including confirmed or possible battery ingestions. Nearly three quarters of the injuries involved children aged ≤4 years; 10% required hospitalization. Battery type was reported for 69% of cases, and of those, button batteries were implicated in 58%. Fourteen fatal injuries were identified in children ranging in age from 7 months to 3 years during 1995–2010. Battery type was reported in 12 of these cases; all involved button batteries. CPSC is urging the electronics industry and battery manufacturers to develop warnings and industry standards to prevent serious injuries and deaths from button batteries. Additionally, public health and health-care providers can encourage parents to keep button batteries and products containing accessible button batteries (e.g., remote controls) away from young children.

NEISS data are collected from 96 hospitals, each with a minimum of six beds and a 24-hour ED,6 which are selected as a stratified probability sample of all hospitals in the United States and its territories.† To obtain national estimates, a sample weight is assigned to each case based on the inverse probability of selection for the sample. NEISS cases were identified using product codes 884 (batteries), 891 (unspecified batteries), and 892 (non–motor-vehicle batteries).§ Battery exposures described in this report include battery ingestion (i.e., an oral exposure), batteries placed in the nose, and acid burns from ruptured batteries. Narratives were examined to exclude cases not meeting this definition (e.g., injuries sustained [such as scalp laceration] from being physically hit with a battery and suspected ingestions that were ruled out by radiographs or other means). Cases identified as confirmed oral exposures included those 1) with a diagnosis of foreign body ingestion; 2) confirmed by radiography or a battery found in the stool; and 3) with an affirmative statement in the narrative of a child swallowing, chewing, or sucking on a battery. Other cases that could not be confirmed as battery ingestions, but could not be excluded as noningestions, also were included. NEISS narratives for these types of cases included the following language: 1) “possibly” or “might have” ingested/swallowed; or 2) suspected ingestion. Of the total 40,400 estimated cases, 3,900 were unconfirmed ingestions that could not be positively excluded.

The Injury and Potential Injury Incident File is a database consisting of injury or potential injury reports to CPSC from various sources, including news clips, consumer complaints, and medical examiners and coroners. The INDP file provides incident details from follow-up interviews with patients and witnesses. The DTHS database collects death certificates for certain causes of death from 50 states, New York City, the District of Columbia, and some U.S. territories.¶

During 1997–2010, an estimated 40,400 children aged <13 years were treated in hospital EDs for battery-related injuries.** Moreover, a statistically significant increasing trend was observed in the yearly estimates (p<0.001), with a 2.5-fold increase in these cases, from 1,900 in 1998 to 4,800 in 2010 (Figure).†† Most of the children were treated and released or examined and released without treatment; approximately 10% required hospitalization. Nearly 72% of all the estimated exposures seen in EDs involved children aged ≤4 years. The battery was identified for 69% of the estimated injuries and among those, 58% of injuries were caused by button-type batteries and 11% by cylindrical batteries. The battery source was identified in 17% of the NEISS cases and included toys, flashlights, remote controls, watches, hearing aids, and light-up jewelry.

Additional CPSC databases covering 1995–2010 were searched for battery-related deaths in children aged <13 years, resulting in the identification of 14 battery-related deaths, all involving children aged <4 years. Thirteen deaths occurred during 2002–2010, with only one documented earlier, in 1998. Button-type batteries were involved in 12 deaths, with 10 described as coin, disc, or flat round batteries and four of these specifically associated with 20-mm, 3-volt lithium batteries such as the CR2032.§§ The remaining two deaths likely were associated with button types because of similarities in the incident scenarios (e.g., nonspecific symptoms with delayed diagnosis or a battery lodged in the esophagus) or causes of death (e.g., esophageal perforation with bleeding).

In four of the fatal cases, patients were misdiagnosed and released, delaying identification and treatment. For example, a boy, aged 2 years, was treated and released from the ED for coughing/choking episodes and abdominal pain (case 3). Eight days later, he was brought back to the ED unconscious and in respiratory distress. He subsequently died from bleeding associated with a perforated esophagus and aorta caused by ingestion of a round, flat battery from a remote control. Additionally, in three cases previously reported (4; National Battery Ingestion Hotline database, unpublished data, 2012), children sent home after battery removal suffered a fatal hemorrhage several days to weeks later (cases 4, 9, and 10).

Reported by: Jacqueline Ferrante, PhD, Div of Health Sciences; Craig O’Brien, MS, Div of Hazard Analysis; Cheryl Osterhout, PhD, Div of Health Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission. Julie Gilchrist, MD, Div of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC. Corresponding contributor: Jacqueline Ferrante, jferrante@cpsc.gov, 301-504-7259.

Editorial Note: The findings in this report highlight the growing problem of battery ingestions, especially of button batteries, by children aged <13 years. As the use of these batteries expands, so do the estimated number of ED-treated battery exposures in children, with the vast majority of these involving ingestions. This information is consistent with recent reports showing an increase in severe or fatal outcomes with button battery ingestions from 1985 to 2009.7 At least five deaths identified in this report appear to be documented in the National Battery Ingestion Hotline database.¶¶

Three proposed mechanisms of battery-induced injury include 1) leakage of caustic alkaline electrolyte; 2) ischemic necrosis caused by direct pressure; and 3) production of an external electrolytic current that hydrolyzes tissue fluids, creating hydroxide at the negative pole.4,5,7 Medical experts have attributed severe injuries and death to the latter mechanism when button batteries get lodged in the esophagus rather than passing through the gastrointestinal tract.3,7 Another complicating factor arises when incidents are not witnessed or the diagnosis or treatment of battery ingestion is delayed as it was in at least nine of the 14 fatal cases.

Typical symptoms associated with battery ingestion are relatively nonspecific, making the diagnosis difficult, particularly when ingestions go unwitnessed. These include vomiting, abdominal pain, fever, diarrhea, respiratory distress, and dysphagia.5 Serious complications and death are associated most frequently with 3-volt lithium, coin-size batteries ≥20 mm in diameter.7 Since a battery lodged in the esophagus can cause serious burns in only 2 hours, and fatal hemorrhage has occurred >2 weeks after endoscopic removal, health-care providers have developed management guidelines for button battery ingestion.3***

To protect children, the CPSC sets safety standards for toys. Under Section 106 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008,††† the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) international voluntary standard for toy safety, known as F963-11, became mandatory. ASTM F963-11 requires that batteries be inaccessible (e.g., secured in compartments with screws) in all toys intended for children aged <3 years and in all toys using batteries that fit within the small parts test cylinder§§§ for children aged <12 years. The latter requirement recognizes that smaller batteries, which can be easily ingested, should be kept inaccessible to all children and that older siblings might leave their toys accessible to younger siblings. Recently, ASTM issued a new safety standard for children's jewelry, F2923-11, which has a similar requirement to prevent button battery access by children.¶¶¶ Legislation also is under consideration in Congress to address the potential risk of unintentional ingestion of button cell batteries by requiring that child-resistant battery compartment closures are used on all consumer products using button cell batteries. Measures that might protect children from battery-related injuries include child-resistant packaging for batteries, changing to child-resistant closures on all consumer products that use button batteries, and warnings regarding the dangers of ingestion on packages of button cell batteries and in literature accompanying all consumer products that use button cell batteries. At least three deaths in this report involved devices not intended for use by small children. Additionally, increased public awareness through public health and health-care providers could reduce exposure to and injuries from these batteries.

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, NEISS case narratives are brief, and detailed information is not always provided unless a follow-up investigation is conducted. Second, NEISS documents only ED visits; it does not capture incidents involving untreated persons or patients treated in doctors' offices or outpatient facilities. Finally, the fatality data in this report are a case series based on available CPSC databases and might underrepresent the extent of the problem.

Parents and caregivers should be aware of the potential hazards associated with battery exposure (particularly ingestion of button batteries) and ensure that products containing them are either kept away from children or that the batteries are secured safely in the product.**** Because delays in diagnosis and treatment can lead to serious complications and death, children suspected of having ingested a battery should get prompt medical attention. It is also important to recognize that children might be reluctant or unable to say that they ingested a battery or gave one to a sibling. Additional battery hazard information is available at http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml11/11181.html.††††

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC?

Injuries to children caused by batteries have been documented in the medical literature and by poison control centers for decades. Of particular concern is the ingestion of button batteries, especially those ≥20 mm in diameter (coin size), which can lodge in the esophagus, leading to serious complications or death.

What is added by this report?

During 1997–2010, an estimated 40,400 children aged <13 years were treated in hospital emergency departments for battery-related injuries. Nearly three quarters of the injuries involved children aged ≤4 years; 10% required hospitalization. Moreover, a 2.5-fold increase in these cases was observed from 1998 to 2010. Fourteen battery-related fatalities were identified, all in children aged <4 years. Button batteries were confirmed to be involved in 12 of the 14 cases.

What are the implications for public health practice?

To improve medical outcomes, health-care providers should be aware of the injuries associated with ingestion of button cell batteries. Given the increasing use of such batteries, public health and health-care providers should include warnings of the dangers of button cell battery exposures when counseling parents. To prevent serious injury and death, button batteries and products containing button batteries (e.g., remote controls) should be kept away from young children unless the batteries are secured safely in the product.

REFERENCES

7 Available.

*Generally, a battery with a diameter greater than its height is referred to as button or coin-size, depending on its width (e.g., a button battery with the width of a nickel coin is approximately 21 mm in diameter).

†Hospital EDs are grouped into five strata, with four based on size (i.e., annual number of ED visits) and a fifth representing children's hospitals.

§Battery types include button and cylindrical (e.g., AA, AAA, C, and D).

¶Death certificate collection takes time. As of July 2011, DTHS was considered 97% complete for 2007, 87% complete for 2008, 73% complete for 2009, and 34% complete for 2010.

**CPSC staff did not analyze NEISS data from 1995 to 1996 because the sample frame and sample changed in 1997.

††NEISS data for 1997 were not sufficient to provide a reliable estimate. The trend analysis was an F-test of the year effect on the estimates adjusted for changes in the population.

§§The designation CR2032 defines a 3-volt lithium battery that is 20 mm in diameter (approximately the size of a nickel) with a height of 3.2 mm.

¶¶Database available at http://www.poison.org/battery. Possible duplicate cases cannot be confirmed without more detailed incident information.

***Additional information available at http://www.poison.org/battery/guideline.asp.

†††Additional information available at http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/cpsia.html.

§§§Specifications for the small parts test cylinder are described in 16 CFR § 1501.4. Additional information available at http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/regsumsmallparts.pdf.

¶¶¶Additional information available at http://www.astmnewsroom.org/default.aspx?pageid=2620.

****Additional information available at http://www.poison.org/battery/tips.asp.

††††Three deaths in children associated with battery ingestion occurred since the compilation of data for this report. Two cases were identified in 2011. The first case involved a boy aged 3 years who died after ingesting a button battery. The battery became impacted in his esophagus and caused acute esophageal bleeding because of an esophageal-aortic fistula. In the second case, a girl aged 13 months died after she swallowed a 2-cm (or 20-mm) watch battery and it lodged in her esophagus. Most recently, in 2012, a boy aged 4 years died after complications from swallowing a button battery. The boy complained of pain in his throat 4 days after reportedly swallowing a battery, and a battery was located in his stomach and removed without incident. The boy remained in the hospital and suffered complications, including an esophageal leak. He died 32 days after ingestion of the button battery.

Tables

References

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles