0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report|

Update: Influenza Activity—United States, October 2–November 26, 2011 FREE

JAMA. 2012;307(3):244-247. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

MMWR. 2011;60:1646-1649

1 figure omitted

During October 2–November 26, 2011, influenza activity remained low in the United States. Thus far, influenza A viruses have predominated, and the majority are antigenically related to the 2011-12 influenza vaccine strains for the Northern Hemisphere. This report summarizes U.S. influenza activity* since October 2 and updates the previous summary.1

VIRAL SURVEILLANCE

During October 2–November 26,† the World Health Organization (WHO) and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System collaborating laboratories in the United States tested 24,027 respiratory specimens for influenza viruses; 266 (1.1%) were positive (Figure 1). Of these, 191 (71.8%) were influenza A viruses, and 75 (28.2%) were influenza B viruses. Of the 191 influenza A viruses, 87 (45.5%) were subtyped; 79 (90.8%) were influenza A (H3) viruses, and eight (9.1%) were 2009 influenza A (H1) viruses. Influenza viruses have been reported from 30 states in all 10 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regions. Of the 266 influenza-positive specimens reported to CDC so far this season, most (131 of 266 [49.2%]) have been reported from the southeastern United States (Region 4 [Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee]).

ANTIGENIC CHARACTERIZATION

WHO collaborating laboratories in the United States are requested to submit a subset of their influenza-positive specimens to CDC for further antigenic characterization. CDC has antigenically characterized 21 influenza viruses collected and submitted by U.S. laboratories since October 1, 2011, including one 2009 influenza A (H1N1), 16 influenza A (H3N2) and four influenza B viruses. The one 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus was characterized as A/California/7/2009-like, the influenza A (H1N1) component of the 2011-12 influenza vaccine for the Northern Hemisphere. All 16 influenza A (H3N2) viruses were antigenically related to the A/Perth/16/2009, the influenza A (H3N2) component included in the 2011-12 influenza vaccine for the Northern Hemisphere. Three of the four influenza B viruses tested belong to the B/Victoria lineage and were characterized as B/Brisbane/60/2008-like, the influenza B component of the 2011-12 influenza vaccine for the Northern Hemisphere; one of the four B viruses tested belongs to the B/Yamagata lineage of viruses.

ANTIVIRAL RESISTANCE OF INFLUENZA VIRUS ISOLATES

CDC conducts surveillance for resistance of circulating influenza viruses to influenza antiviral medications. Since October 1, 2011, a total of 31 influenza viruses (five 2009 influenza A (H1N1), 24 influenza A (H3N2), and two influenza B viruses) have been tested for antiviral resistance. None of the tested viruses were found to be resistant to either oseltamivir or zanamivir.

NOVEL INFLUENZA A VIRUSES

Since the last influenza activity update,1 six cases of human infection with a novel influenza A virus‡ were reported: two from Maine and one from Indiana in October,2 as well as three from Iowa in November. All six patients were infected with novel influenza A (H3N2) viruses with genes from swine, human, and avian lineages. The two cases in Maine occurred in children, and the case in Indiana occurred in an adult male; all patients had exposure to swine in the period immediately preceding their illness. All three cases in Iowa occurred in children with no known recent exposure to swine. The investigation in Iowa revealed evidence of limited human-to human transmission.2 All patients recovered fully.

STATE-SPECIFIC ACTIVITY LEVELS

For the week ending November 26, the geographic spread of influenza§ was reported as local by one state (Massachusetts). Sporadic influenza activity was reported by the District of Columbia (DC), Guam, and 28 states. The U.S. Virgin Islands and 21 states reported no influenza activity. Puerto Rico did not report. No states have reported geographically regional or widespread influenza activity to date for the 2011-12 influenza season.

OUTPATIENT INFLUENZA-LIKE ILLNESS

Since October 2, the weekly percentage of outpatient visits for influenza-like illness (ILI)∥ reported each week by the approximately 1,500 U.S. Outpatient Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet) reporters in 50 states, New York City, Chicago, and DC, has remained below the national baseline¶ of 2.4% (Figure). None of the regions have been above their region-specific baselines. Data collected in ILINet also are used to produce a measure of ILI activity by state. During the week ending November 26, all 50 states and New York City experienced minimal ILI activity. Data were insufficient to calculate an ILI activity level from DC.#

PNEUMONIA- AND INFLUENZA-RELATED MORTALITY

For the week ending November 26, pneumonia and influenza (P&I) was reported as an underlying or contributing cause of death for 6.4% of all deaths reported to the 122 Cities Mortality Reporting System. This percentage is below the epidemic threshold** of 7.1% for that week. Since October 2, 2011, the weekly percentage of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza ranged from 5.9% to 6.4%, remaining below the epidemic threshold.

INFLUENZA-RELATED PEDIATRIC MORTALITY

No influenza-related pediatric deaths have been reported through the Influenza Associated Pediatric Mortality Surveillance System for the 2011-12 influenza season.

REPORTED BY:

World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Control of Influenza. Lynnette Brammer, MPH, Scott Epperson, MPH, Krista Kniss, MPH, Desiree Mustaquim, MPH, Amber Bishop, MPH, Rosaline Dhara, MPH, Michael Jhung, MD, Lenee Blanton, MPH, Teresa Wallis, MS, Lyn Finelli, DrPH, Larisa Gubareva, PhD, Joseph Bresee, MD, Alexander Klimov, PhD, Nancy Cox, PhD, Influenza Div, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; Grace Chen, MD, EIS Officer, CDC. Corresponding contributor: Grace Chen, glchen@cdc.gov, 404-718-4585.

CDC EDITORIAL NOTE:

Since October 2, surveillance data have indicated that influenza is circulating at low levels in the United States; low activity typically is noted in this early portion of the influenza season. Antigenic characterization of the viral isolates that have been submitted demonstrated that the majority of these isolates are antigenically similar to the influenza virus strains in the Northern Hemisphere 2011-12 vaccine.

Influenza vaccination is the best method for preventing influenza and its associated complications. Influenza vaccination currently is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months.3 Vaccine manufacturers had distributed approximately 129.2 million doses of influenza vaccine in the United States as of November 25.4 Influenza vaccination should continue to be offered by health-care providers throughout the influenza season for all persons without contraindications to vaccination to provide protection for as many persons as possible. Multiple influenza vaccines are approved for use and are being distributed during the 2011-12 season, including trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) for persons aged ≥6 months; live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) for nonpregnant, otherwise healthy persons aged 2-49 years; a high-dose inactivated vaccine for persons aged ≥65 years; and a new, intradermally administered vaccine, which was licensed by the Food and Drug Administration on May 10, 2011, for adults aged 18-64 years.3 Children aged 6 months–8 years who did not receive 2 doses of the 2010-11 seasonal influenza vaccine should receive 2 doses (administered at least 4 weeks apart) of the 2011-12 seasonal influenza vaccine.3

Although annual vaccination is the best method for preventing and reducing the impact of influenza, influenza antiviral medications are an important adjunct, particularly under circumstances and in groups where vaccine might be less efficacious.5 The benefits of influenza antiviral treatment are likely to be greatest if treatment is started as soon as possible after illness onset, and evidence for benefit is strongest in studies in which treatment was started within 48 hours of illness onset.5 Antiviral treatment is recommended as early as possible for patients with confirmed or suspected influenza who have severe, complicated, or progressive illness; who require hospitalization; or who are at greater risk for influenza-related complications.††5 However, substantial observational data and one study in pregnant women6 have indicated that antiviral treatment still can be beneficial in patients with severe, complicated, or progressive illness and in hospitalized patients even when administered more than 48 hours after illness onset.5,7 In such cases, decisions on starting antiviral treatment should not wait for laboratory confirmation of influenza. Antiviral treatment also may be considered for outpatients with confirmed or suspected influenza who do not have known risk factors for severe illness if treatment can be initiated within 48 hours of illness onset. Recommended antiviral medications include oseltamivir and zanamivir.

Transmission of swine-origin influenza A viruses to humans is rare and usually occurs among persons in direct contact with swine or among persons who have visited places where swine are present (e.g., agricultural fairs, farms, and petting zoos). Clinicians should consider swine-origin influenza A virus infection as well as seasonal influenza virus infections in the differential diagnosis of patients with febrile respiratory illness who have been near swine.8 Clinicians who suspect influenza virus infection in patients with recent exposure to swine should obtain a nasopharyngeal swab from the patient, place the swab in a viral transport medium, and contact their state or local health department to facilitate transport and timely diagnosis at a state public health laboratory. Public health laboratories are requested to submit any suspected swine-origin influenza A samples to CDC for further testing. Early identification and prompt investigation of novel influenza A cases is critical to evaluating the extent of outbreaks and possible human-to-human transmission.

Influenza surveillance reports for the United States are posted online weekly and are available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly. Additional information regarding influenza viruses, influenza surveillance, influenza vaccine, influenza antiviral medications, and novel influenza A infections in humans is available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

State and territorial health departments and public health laboratories. U.S. World Health Organization collaborating laboratories. National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System collaborating laboratories. U.S. Outpatient Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance Network. Influenza-Associated Pediatric Mortality Surveillance System. 122 Cities Mortality Reporting System.

What is already known on this topic?

CDC collects, compiles, and analyzes data on influenza activity year-round in the United States. Although influenza activity this season has been low, the influenza season continues through the winter and spring months.

What is added by this report?

The United States has continued to experience low levels of influenza activity from October 2 to November 26, 2011, and influenza A (H3N2), 2009 influenza A (H1N1), and influenza B viruses have been identified sporadically. The majority of viral isolates that have been submitted to CDC for testing are antigenically similar to the influenza vaccine strains in the Northern Hemisphere 2011-12 vaccine.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Influenza currently is circulating at low levels at this early point in the season. The influenza viruses currently circulating are a good match with the influenza vaccine. Vaccination remains the best method for preventing influenza and its associated complications and, influenza vaccination is recommended in all persons aged ≥6 months. Antiviral medications are an important adjunct in reducing the impact of influenza, and the benefits are likely to be greatest if antiviral treatment is started as soon as possible after illness onset.

*The CDC influenza surveillance system collects five categories of information from eight data sources: (1) viral surveillance (World Health Organization collaborating U.S. laboratories, the National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System, and novel influenza A virus case reporting); (2) outpatient illness surveillance (U.S. Outpatient Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance Network); (3) mortality (122 Cities Mortality Reporting System and influenza-associated pediatric mortality reports); (4) hospitalizations (FluSurvNet, which includes the Emerging Infections Program and surveillance in four additional states); and (5) summary of geographic spread of influenza (state and territorial epidemiologist reports).

†Data as of December 3, 2011.

‡Discussions concerning virus nomenclature related to these novel H3N2 viruses, also referred to as swine-origin triple reassortant influenza A (H3N2) viruses, identified in this report are ongoing.

§Levels of geographic spread are (1) no activity; (2) sporadic: isolated laboratory-confirmed influenza cases or a laboratory-confirmed outbreak in one institution, with no increase in activity; (3) local: increased ILI, or at least two institutional outbreaks (ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza) in one region with recent laboratory evidence of influenza in that region; virus activity no greater than sporadic in other regions; (4) regional: increased ILI activity or institutional outbreaks (ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza) in at least two but less than half of the regions in the state with recent laboratory evidence of influenza in those regions; and (5) widespread: increased ILI activity or institutional outbreaks (ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza) in at least half the regions in the state, with recent laboratory evidence of influenza in the state.

∥Defined as a temperature of ≥100.0°F (≥37.8°C), oral or equivalent, and cough and/or sore throat, in the absence of a known cause other than influenza.

¶The national and regional baselines are the mean percentage of visits for ILI during noninfluenza weeks for the previous three seasons plus two standard deviations. A noninfluenza week is a week during which <10% of specimens tested positive for influenza. National and regional percentages of patient visits for ILI are weighted on the basis of state population. Use of the national baseline for regional data is not appropriate.

#Activity levels are based on the percentage of outpatient visits in a state for ILI and are compared with the average percentage of ILI visits that occur during weeks with little or no influenza virus circulation. Activity levels range from minimal, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being at or below the average, to high, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being much higher than the average. Because the clinical definition of ILI is very general, not all ILI is caused by influenza; however, when combined with laboratory data, the information on ILI activity provides a clear picture of influenza activity in the United States.

**The seasonal baseline proportion of pneumonia and influenza deaths is projected using a robust regression procedure in which a periodic regression model is applied to the observed percentage of deaths from pneumonia and influenza that were reported by the 122 Cities Mortality Reporting System during the preceding 5 years. The epidemic threshold is 1.645 standard deviations above the seasonal baseline.

††Persons at greater risk include children aged <5 years (especially those aged <2 years); adults aged ≥65 years; persons with chronic pulmonary (including asthma), cardiovascular (except hypertension alone), renal, hepatic, hematologic (including sickle cell disease), metabolic (including diabetes mellitus), or neurologic and neurodevelopmental conditions (including disorders of the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerve, and muscle, such as cerebral palsy, epilepsy [seizure disorders], stroke, intellectual disability [mental retardation], moderate to severe developmental delay, muscular dystrophy, or spinal cord injury); persons with immunosuppression, including that caused by medications or by human immunodeficiency virus infection; women who are pregnant or postpartum (within 2 weeks after delivery); persons aged ≤18 years who are receiving long-term aspirin therapy; American Indians/Alaska Natives; persons who are morbidly obese (i.e., body mass index ≥40); and residents of nursing homes and other chronic-care facilities.

REFERENCES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Update: influenza activity—United States and worldwide, May 22-September 3, 2011.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(36):1239-1242
PubMed
CDC.  Limited human-to-human transmission of novel influenza A (H3N2) virus—Iowa.  MMWR. 2011;60:1615-1617
PubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2011.  MMWR. 2011;60(33):1128-1132
PubMed
CDC.  Seasonal influenza vaccine—total doses distributed. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2011. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/vaccination/vaccinesupply.htm. Accessed December 2, 2011
CDC.  Antiviral agents for the treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza—recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).  MMWR. 2011;60(RR-1):
Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA,  et al; Pandemic H1N1 Influenza in Pregnancy Working Group.  Pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United States.  JAMA. 2010;303(15):1517-1525
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Yu H, Feng Z, Uyeki TM,  et al.  Risk factors for severe illness with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in China.  Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4):457-465
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Swine-origin influenza A (H3N2) virus infection in two children—Indiana and Pennsylvania, July-August 2011.  MMWR. 2011;60(35):1213-1215
PubMed

Tables

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Update: influenza activity—United States and worldwide, May 22-September 3, 2011.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(36):1239-1242
PubMed
CDC.  Limited human-to-human transmission of novel influenza A (H3N2) virus—Iowa.  MMWR. 2011;60:1615-1617
PubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2011.  MMWR. 2011;60(33):1128-1132
PubMed
CDC.  Seasonal influenza vaccine—total doses distributed. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2011. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/vaccination/vaccinesupply.htm. Accessed December 2, 2011
CDC.  Antiviral agents for the treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza—recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).  MMWR. 2011;60(RR-1):
Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA,  et al; Pandemic H1N1 Influenza in Pregnancy Working Group.  Pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United States.  JAMA. 2010;303(15):1517-1525
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Yu H, Feng Z, Uyeki TM,  et al.  Risk factors for severe illness with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in China.  Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4):457-465
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Swine-origin influenza A (H3N2) virus infection in two children—Indiana and Pennsylvania, July-August 2011.  MMWR. 2011;60(35):1213-1215
PubMed

Letters

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Influenza

The Rational Clinical Examination
Make the Diagnosis: Influenza