0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Deciding Life and Death in the Courtroom: Debate and Clarification

James P. Farrell, MD
JAMA. 1998;279(16):1259-1261. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-279-16-jac80007.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

To the Editor.—It is easier to find dogmatic statements than guiding principles in the assisted-suicide debate. I am inclined to rely on my intuition in such situations, and work backward to a principle. I do not wish to belittle the need for legal definitions. In fact, these often clarify precedent and serve to make us all pause where we once felt so certain.

But, I must place the legal system in perspective in this debate. Mr Gostin's article1states, "The judiciary has transformed not only the practice of medicine and the rights of patients, but has also shaped societal values." Rights are inherent and need to be defined. The judiciary cannot and should not try to transform them. The judiciary also cannot shape societal values. It has a duty to reflect societal values (common law?). On the issue in question, however, this inflated view of "judiciary impact" fails to acknowledge that the overwhelming majority of "end-of-life" decisions are comfortably and quietly carried out between patients and their physicians. This compelling empirical observation should guide us to seek the truth in these decisions, rather than assume that they must be occurring unethically without the watchful eye of the judiciary.

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();