0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Potentially Ineffective Care in Intensive Care

Joan M. Teno, MD, MS
JAMA. 1998;279(9):651-654. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-279-9-jbk0304.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

To the Editor.—Prognosis-based futility guidelines have been proposed as the "solution" to solve the problem of the quality of care for dying patients and their families. The allure is that such guidelines are a simple and neat fix to the "high cost of dying." Drs Cher and Lenert1 report that HMOs achieved a 25% reduction in PIC. Yet, I would caution that proposed definitions of futility are value laden and in need of careful public scrutiny. Using data from the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments,2 we simulated a prognosis-based futility guideline that would withdraw life-sustaining treatment in all persons with a predicted 2-month survival of 1%. Such a guideline would reduce total hospital days by 11%, with an estimated savings of $1.2 million. However, a key question for consideration is whether society would accept achieving these savings given that the patient's religious preferences were an important influence on treatment decisions in 5 of the 12 persons who accounted for 75% of the savings.3

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();