We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Rescreening of Cervical Papanicolaou Smears Using PAPNET—Reply

Timothy J. O'Leary, MD, PhD; Sally-Beth Buckner, SCT (ASCP); Curtis W. Ollayos, MD
JAMA. 1998;279(22):1785-1788. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-279-22-jac80008.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply.— Dr Greenberg suggests that the traditional Pap smear should be supplemented with HPV testing when ASCUS, AGUS, or LSIL is encountered. Since our study did not address HPV testing, we cannot address the cost-effectiveness of this strategy, but observe that routine Pap smear testing as infrequently as every 3 years can reduce the incidence of invasive cervical cancer by up to 90%.1

Dr Koss, Drs Mango and Radensky, and Dr Schechter would have preferred we perform a traditional cost-effectiveness analysis of PAPNET, rather than compare this relatively expensive rescreening strategy with the less expensive manual alternative. We wanted to find out how expensive it is to use PAPNET to find abnormal Pap smears that would be missed by manual rescreening. Cost-effectiveness analyses that ignore the existence of a less expensive alternative tend to make the proposed intervention look better than it really is; this is unquestionably the case with both the study by Schechter2 and the study by Radensky and Mango.3 These analyses are further limited by the use of pooled data3 and do not appear to address either interlaboratory variation or uncertainties in the rate of progression of premalignant lesions; these factors are considered more effectively by Raab.4


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.