We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Mortality: How Is Sausage Made?

R. T. Ravenholt, MD, MPH
JAMA. 1998;279(20):1611. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-279-20-jbk0527.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor.—The Finnish Twin Study of leisure-time activity and mortality by Dr Kujala and colleagues1 has inherent strengths not conveyed by the authors' esoteric statistical analysis, replete with P values and confidence intervals but presenting few operative data. Unfortunately, during recent years medical journals have adopted the practice of presenting derivative data values buttressed by P values and confidence intervals, rather than presenting actual numerical study findings so that readers can discern data patterns relative to reputed determinants.2 For example, footnotes in Tables 2 and 4 stating "Adjusted for smoking (pack-years and current smoking habit)" are not adequate substitutes for allowing readers "to see just how sausage is made"—how deaths are distributed in bivariate tables. No sound physician/scientist would have confidence in values derived in a black box and buttressed by confidence intervals. In fact, statistical esoterica are ordinarily aimed at suspending the critical faculty of readers.3,4 For the Finnish Twin Study, readers should be enabled to study tabular mortality data patterns relative to the putative determinant (leisure activity), arrayed against the foremost known determinant of premature mortality (pack-years of smoking), so they can judge the relative strength of these determinants, acting separately or in concert, and thus, gain a measured sense of the operative strength of leisure activity in preventing mortality.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.