We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Standards for Scientific Behavior and Research Integrity—Reply

Stanley G. Korenman, MD; Richard Berk, PhD; Neil S. Wenger, MD; Vivian Lew, PhD
JAMA. 1998;279(14):1067-1068. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-279-14-jac80003.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply.—Ms Jung questions whether our findings demonstrated agreement between scientists and institutional representatives concerning the ethical level of research behaviors but apparently misunderstands the methods and findings of our study. According to the fractional factorial design we used, participants responded to surveys of 12 scenarios that were constructed from randomly chosen phrases consisting of factors hypothesized to be related to whether an act would be judged unethical; this approach resulted in 8364 different possibilities. Thus, no 2 study subjects received the same survey instrument, and each act was considered by only a sample of the respondents. Since the respondents to each question were a random sample of scientists and institutional representatives, the responses could be extrapolated to the populations as a whole. Furthermore, punishments were solicited only from those who considered an act to be unethical. For example, Act 1-1, "fabricates data from scratch," was responded to by 235 scientists and 47 institutional representatives, as noted in Table 1 of our article. All institutional representatives and 99% of scientists felt that this behavior was unethical, with a rating of 9.8 on a 10-point scale. All respondents who considered the act unethical felt that it merited punishment. For this act, consensus was apparently reached.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.