We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Gatekeeping: Good or Bad, but Never Indifferent—Reply

Ethan A. Halm, MD, MPH; David Blumenthal, MD, MPP; Nancyanne Causino, EdD
JAMA. 1998;279(12):908-910. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-279-12-jbk0325.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply.—The comments of Drs Finestone, Feldman, Beasley, and Volpintesta are representative of the heated debate regarding the goals and consequences of gatekeeping. Opponents tend to emphasize negative "controlling" functions (restriction of referrals, procedures, visits to specialists, and hospitalizations), and proponents tend to emphasize positive, primary care "coordinating" activities (overall knowledge of care, prevention, and avoidance of duplicative or unnecessary procedures). To shed more light than heat on this debate, we sought to collect empirical data on both potential favorable and unfavorable effects of gatekeeping on a broad range of domains of care, including administrative work, patient care dynamics, resource use, coordination, and use of preventive services, in addition to global judgments about effects on cost and quality. Feldman questions with our a priori hypothesis that the effects of gatekeeping on cost and quality were of paramount importance. We believe we are in the mainstream in emphasizing these 2 key aspects of health care.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.