We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Gatekeeping: Good or Bad, but Never Indifferent

Debra Feldman, MD
JAMA. 1998;279(12):908-910. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-279-12-jbk0325.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor.—The attitude survey by Dr Halm and colleagues1 provided important results about the gatekeeping aspect of managed care, documenting physicians' attitudes on patient care, administrative, and utilization issues. However, the summary qualitative judgment score, presented to support the conclusion that 72% of respondents felt gatekeeping was better than or comparable to traditional care arrangements, is misleading. This score was based on the respondents' views on the overall effect of the 2 systems on quality and cost. Some physicians may believe that other factors, along with quality and cost, contribute to their final evaluation of gatekeeping. The survey itself provides a possible example. A majority of physicians felt that gatekeeping caused increased administrative work. Many physicians would view the combination of same cost, same quality, and increased administrative work as summing up to a negative assessment of gatekeeping, as opposed to a neutral view that would have been attributed to their use of the summary qualitative judgment score. If the authors wanted to supply an overall assessment of physicians' views on gatekeeping compared with traditional systems, they should have asked the survey group this question directly. As it is, the authors may have significantly misrepresented the views of physicians on gatekeeping.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.