We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Gatekeeping: Good or Bad, but Never Indifferent

Albert J. Finestone, MD
JAMA. 1998;279(12):908-910. doi:10.1001/jama.279.12.908.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor.—As a primary care internist and geriatrician I care both for patients enrolled in managed care organizations (MCOs) and for those insured under traditional Medicare or commercial insurance. I have known medicine before Medicare, with Medicare, and now with managed care. Thus, the article "Is Gatekeeping Better Than Traditional Care?"1 had special relevance for me. In my opinion, gatekeeping has the following positive aspects: (1) I have total responsibility for my decision to use other health care workers, such as visiting nurses and social workers. I can provide nonepisodic care to these patients. (2) I can avoid overutilization of specialists and polypharmacy. (3) Many of my new managed care patients have never had access to modern medical care that is preventive and not episodic. (4) Managed care organizations have access to physicians' office medical records, review these, and can emphasize quality assurance issues, since "those that pay the bills, set the rules." Once yearly, my office records are checked by the MCO. Some of the suggestions are nitpicky, but some have been helpful. However, the use of practice parameters that could have a significant effect on medical practice have not been implemented, ie, the use of warfarin sodium in patients with atrial fibrillation. In the previous system, there was no quality control or accountability by review of office records unless legal problems arose. (5) Billing paperwork is eliminated by capitation.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.